Introduction of the concept of risk within safety science in The Netherlands focussing on the years 1970–1990

Abstract Serious incidents in the 1970s and continuous growth of factories producing and/or using hazardous substances formed the basis of a quantitative approach to risk. While discussions of risk were conducted in all industrialised countries they were particularly important in The Netherlands due to space limitations and short distances between industrial plants and residential areas. This article is part of a series covering the history of the safety science discipline (Swuste et al., 2015; Van Gulijk et al., 2009; Swuste et al., 2010). The concept risk entered the Dutch safety domain before the 1970s in relatively isolated case studies and in managing flood defences in The Netherlands. Since the 1970s these case studies paved the way for the development of mathematical models for quantitative risk analysis that were based on experience from nuclear power plants, the process industries and reliability engineering from operations research. ‘External safety’ was a focal point for these early developments in the process industries: adverse effects of dangerous goods outside the factory’s property boundaries. The models were documented in standardised textbooks for risk analysis in The Netherlands, the so-called ‘coloured books’. These works contributed to the development of the Seveso Directive. For internal safety (taking place within property boundaries) semi-quantitative approaches were developed simultaneously. The models for quantitative risk analysis were deemed reliable, but the acceptability of a quantified risk was another matter. Making decisions on risk relates to complex societal issues, such as ethics, stakeholder perception of risks, stakeholder involvement, and politics, all of which made the decision making process far from straightforward. With the introduction of the abstract concept of risk in the Dutch safety science domain, the question of risk perception became important in Dutch safety research. The concept risk and methods for quantitative risk analysis first entered into Dutch law in environmental risk regulations. It took a while for risk to be accepted by occupational safety experts, but just before the turn of the century ‘occupational risk inventory and evaluations’ or RI&E methods were introduced into Dutch occupational safety legislation. This finalised the paradigm shift to risk-based safety-decision making in the Dutch safety science domain. While methods for quantifying risk are now widely applied and accepted, the proper use of risk perception and risk in the political decision process are still being debated.

[1]  William T. Fine,et al.  Mathematical evaluation for controlling hazards , 1971 .

[2]  P. Swuste,et al.  Occupational safety theories, models and metaphors in the three decades since World War II, in the United States, Britain and the Netherlands: A literature review , 2014 .

[3]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety , 1984 .

[4]  J. P. Visser,et al.  Developments in HSE Management in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production , 1998 .

[5]  B.J.M Ale,et al.  Risk assessment practices in The Netherlands , 2002 .

[6]  Paul Swuste,et al.  Safety metaphors and theories, a review of the occupational safety literature of the US, UK and The Netherlands, till the first part of the 20th century , 2010 .

[7]  A. N. Kolmogorov,et al.  Foundations of the theory of probability , 1960 .

[8]  Trevor Kletz Accident data—the need for a new look at the sort of data that are collected and analysed , 1993 .

[9]  G. F. Kinney,et al.  Practical Risk Analysis for Safety Management , 1976 .

[10]  Lewis A. DeBlois Industrial safety organization for executive and engineer , 1926 .

[11]  Hans J. Pasman History of Dutch process equipment failure frequencies and the Purple Book , 2011 .

[12]  S. R. Jammalamadaka,et al.  Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk , 1999 .

[13]  W. Denson,et al.  The history of reliability prediction , 1998 .

[14]  C. Starr Social benefit versus technological risk. , 1969, Science.

[15]  H. G Lawley Operability Studies and Hazard Analysis , 1974 .

[16]  V. C. Marshall Major Chemical Hazards , 1987 .

[17]  A. C. van den Berg,et al.  The multi-energy method : A framework for vapour cloud explosion blast prediction , 1985 .

[18]  Trevor Kletz,et al.  The Origins and History of Loss Prevention , 1999 .

[19]  D. Dantzig Economic decision problems for flood prevention , 1956 .

[20]  Openbaar Lichaam Rijnmond Risk analysis of six potentially hazardous industrial objects in the Rijnmond area, a pilot study : a report to the Rijnmond Public Authority , 1982 .

[21]  A. Hay,et al.  Canvey - Investigation of Potential Hazards from Operations in the Canvey Island Thurrock Area - Health-And-Safety-Executive , 1979 .

[22]  Robert G. Easierling An Anatomy of Risk , 1977 .

[23]  Benefits and risks: their assessment in relation to human needs , 1980 .

[24]  Frank P. Lees,et al.  Loss Prevention In The Process Industries , 1980 .

[25]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[26]  Koninklijk Instituut van Ingenieurs,et al.  Loss prevention and safety promotion in the process industries : proceedings of the 1st International Loss Prevention Symposium, the Hague, Delft, the Netherlands, 28-30 May 1974 , 1974 .

[27]  Wytse J. Wadman,et al.  Health Council of the Netherlands: No need to change from SAR to time-temperature relation in electromagnetic fields exposure limits , 2011, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[28]  A. Coppola,et al.  Reliability engineering of electronic equipment a historical perspective , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[29]  Dealing with Risk: the Planning, Management, and Acceptability of Technological Risk , 1981 .

[30]  H. W. Heinrich,et al.  Industrial Accident Prevention: a Scientific Approach , 1951 .

[31]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Highlights from the early (and pre-) history of reliability engineering , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..