The influence of moral sensitivity on organizational cooperation

The purpose of this paper is to present how to model moral sensitivity and emotions in organizational setting by using the SocLab formal framework. SocLab is a platform for the modelling, simulation and analysis of cooperation relationships within social organizations – and more generally Systems of Organized Action. Design/methodology/approach – Simulation results, including an interesting tendency for a Free Rider model, will be given. Considering that actors’ decision-making processes are not just driven by instrumental interest, the SocLab learning simulation algorithm has been extended to represent moral sensitivity, making actors trying to prevent bad emotions and feel good ones. Findings – Some simulation results about actors’ collaboration and emotions in a Free Rider model were presented. A noteworthy tendency is that actors’ unconditional collaboration, which occurs when their moral sensitivity reaches its highest value, is not so good since it exempts other actors from collaboration (they take advantage from the unconditional collaboration), while values of moral sensitivity somewhat below the highest value (between 0.7 and 0.9) still induces collaboration from others. Originality/value – The research and results presented in this paper have not been presented in other papers or workshops. The presented quantitative definition of emotions (determining indexes of emotions) is different to previous approaches – for instance, to Ortony, Clore and Collins (OCC) qualitative descriptions and to logical descriptions. Similarly, simulation of morality in organizations is a new research field, which has received scarce attention up to now.

[1]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[2]  Mehdi Dastani,et al.  A formal model of emotion triggers: an approach for BDI agents , 2011, Synthese.

[4]  Robert Axelrod Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences , 1997 .

[5]  Christophe Sibertin-Blanc,et al.  A Coordination Framework Based on the Sociology of Organized Action , 2005, AAMAS Workshops.

[6]  H. Leventhal Toward A Comprehensive Theory of Emotion , 1980 .

[7]  Françoise Adreit,et al.  SocLab: A Framework for the Modeling, Simulation and Analysis of Power in Social Organizations , 2013, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[8]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  Simulating Social Complexity. A Handbook. Series: Understanding Complex Systems , 2013 .

[9]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  Agent-Based Computational Sociology , 2012 .

[10]  A. Ortony,et al.  Cognition in emotion: Always, sometimes, or never , 2000 .

[11]  Benoit Gaudou,et al.  Identifying Emotion in Organizational Settings - Towards Dealing with Morality , 2014, ICAART.

[12]  Christophe Sibertin-Blanc,et al.  Impact of Tenacity upon the Behaviors of Social Actors , 2009, PRIMA Workshops.

[13]  Joseph el-Gemayel Modèles de la rationalité des acteurs sociaux. (Models for the rationality of social actors) , 2013 .

[14]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  Actors and Systems: The Politics of Collective Action. , 1980 .

[15]  Françoise Adreit,et al.  Using Soclab for a Rigorous Assessment of the Social Feasibility of Agricultural Policies , 2011, Int. J. Agric. Environ. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Christophe Sibertin-Blanc,et al.  Boundedly Rational Agents Playing the Social Actors Game: How to Reach Cooperation , 2013, 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT).

[17]  K. Scherer,et al.  Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development , 2013 .

[18]  J. Gross Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  R. Axelrod The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoists , 1981, American Political Science Review.