Analysis of pilot-related equipment and archaeological strategy in the recovery of aircrew losses from the Vietnam War.

Determining the location and distribution of cockpit and aircrew-related equipment within the wider debris field of a military aircraft crash site is an essential first step in planning and executing the recovery of missing aircrew members presumed still to be on the site. Understanding the spatial relationship of these materials improves the likelihood of finding and recovering the remains of the aircrew during the excavation of an aircraft crash site. Since the greater portion of these unaccounted for crewmembers were involved in aircraft with single-seat cockpits or cockpits with two or three seats in tandem, pre-analysis of the debris pattern may be more-or-less straightforward. Larger, multiple-personnel aircraft, on the other hand, create a potentially more complex analytical situation given the aircrew's greater freedom of movement within the aircraft. Nevertheless, the same fundamental principles apply and, indeed, have been successfully so for some time in the civilian arena. But older aircraft crash sites, i.e., those dating to World War II, Korea, or the Vietnam conflict, have been and still are undergoing taphonomic processes that progressively alter these relationships. The following will illustrate that exchange of information between the anthropologist/archaeologist and the life-support analyst is required to maximize the effectiveness of field recovery and demonstrates the relationship between the recovery of life-support equipment and human remains and the effect that aircraft type has on this relationship.

[1]  R W Mann,et al.  Time since death and decomposition of the human body: variables and observations in case and experimental field studies. , 1990, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  F. Patel Artefact in forensic medicine: postmortem rodent activity. , 1994, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  W. Haglund Disappearance of soft tissue and the disarticulation of human remains from aqueous environments. , 1993, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  D. Ubelaker,et al.  Alterations in human bones and teeth as a result of restricted sun exposure and contact with corrosive agents. , 1988, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  W. Haglund Contribution of rodents to postmortem artifacts of bone and soft tissue. , 1992, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  D. Thomas Figuring anthropology: First principles of probability and statistics , 1976 .

[7]  D. R. Swindler,et al.  Tooth mark artifacts and survival of bones in animal scavenged human skeletons. , 1988, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  D. Spennemann,et al.  Decomposition of buried human bodies and associated death scene materials on coral atolls in the tropical Pacific. , 1995, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  W. Haglund,et al.  Problems of recovering partial human remains at different times and locations: concerns for death investigators. , 1993, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  Dan Morse,et al.  The Degree of Deterioration of Associated Death Scene Material , 1985 .

[11]  L. Snyder,et al.  Canid modification of human remains: implications for time-since-death estimations. , 1989, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  Marcella H. Sorg,et al.  Forensic Taphonomy : The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains , 1996 .