Use of prisms for navigation and driving in hemianopic patients

Purpose:  (1) To compare the outcomes of orientation and mobility and driving training with Fresnel prisms and the Gottlieb Visual Field Awareness System for patients with homonymous hemianopsia, and (2) To determine whether the patients continue to use the optical enhancement devices at a 2‐year follow‐up point.

[1]  R Troutbeck,et al.  Effect of restriction of the binocular visual field on driving performance , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[2]  J. R. Scotti,et al.  Available From , 1973 .

[3]  J P Szlyk,et al.  Evaluation of driving performance in patients with juvenile macular dystrophies. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  M. Brigell,et al.  Effects of Age and Hemianopic Visual Field Loss on Driving , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[6]  J. Szlyk,et al.  A comparison of driving in older subjects with and without age-related macular degeneration. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  M. Reding,et al.  Fresnel prisms improve visual perception in stroke patients with homonymous hemianopia or unilateral visual neglect , 1990, Neurology.

[8]  E. Peli.  OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE Copyright © 2000 American Academy of Optometry ORIGINAL ARTICLE Field Expansion for Homonymous Hemianopia by Optically Induced Peripheral Exotropia , 2022 .

[9]  G. Fishman,et al.  Driving performance of retinitis pigmentosa patients. , 1981, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  N J Weiss.  An application of cemented prisms with severe field loss. , 1972, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  J. Szlyk,et al.  Assessment of driving performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  Joanne M. Wood,et al.  Vision and Driving: Selective Effect of Optical Blur on Different Driving Tasks , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[13]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  Clinical research and statistical analysis of a visual field awareness system. , 1992, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[14]  D B Elliott,et al.  The reliability of the Pelli‐Robson contrast sensitivity chart , 1990, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[15]  A curriculum for training patients with peripheral visual field loss to use bioptic amorphic lenses. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  I L Bailey,et al.  Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  C. Johnson,et al.  Incidence of visual field loss in 20,000 eyes and its relationship to driving performance. , 1983, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  C. Owsley,et al.  PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE EYE , 2022 .

[19]  J. Szlyk,et al.  Driving Performance of Glaucoma Patients Correlates With Peripheral Visual Field Loss , 2005, Journal of glaucoma.

[20]  Janet P Szlyk,et al.  Driving performance in patients with mild to moderate glaucomatous clinical vision changes. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  A. Colenbrander,et al.  Low vision rehabilitation: vision requirements for driving. , 1992, Journal of ophthalmic nursing & technology.