Evolution of protein-coding genes in Drosophila.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Alex Wong | Timothy B Sackton | David Sturgill | Brian Oliver | Andrew G Clark | Anthony J Greenberg | A. Clark | A. Wong | B. Oliver | A. Larracuente | Nadia D. Singh | A. Greenberg | D. Sturgill | Yu Zhang | Nadia D Singh | Yu Zhang | Amanda M Larracuente | A. Clark | A. Clark | David Sturgill
[1] P. Keightley,et al. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. , 2000, Science.
[2] T. Borza,et al. Evolutionary Rates and Expression Level in Chlamydomonas , 2006, Genetics.
[3] W. Swanson,et al. Pervasive Adaptive Evolution in Primate Seminal Proteins , 2005, PLoS genetics.
[4] A. Clark,et al. Genetic recombination: Intron size and natural selection , 1999, Nature.
[5] D. Petrov,et al. Protein Evolution in the Context of Drosophila Development , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[6] J. Felsenstein. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. , 1974, Genetics.
[7] M. Noor,et al. A recombinational portrait of the Drosophila pseudoobscura genome. , 2006, Genetical research.
[8] Hans Ellegren,et al. The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[9] J. Coyne,et al. THE LOCUS OF EVOLUTION: EVO DEVO AND THE GENETICS OF ADAPTATION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[10] J. Powell,et al. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.
[11] A. Clark,et al. Contrasting the efficacy of selection on the X and autosomes in Drosophila. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.
[12] M. Aguadé,et al. Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. , 1999, Genetics.
[13] L. Duret,et al. Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[14] James R. Knight,et al. A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Science.
[15] C. Pál,et al. Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. , 2001, Genetics.
[16] J. Hey,et al. Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila. , 2002, Genetics.
[17] N. Goldman,et al. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. , 2000, Genetics.
[18] Blake C Meyers,et al. Effects of gene expression on molecular evolution in Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis lyrata. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.
[19] J. Peck. A ruby in the rubbish: beneficial mutations, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. , 1994, Genetics.
[20] Pär K Ingvarsson,et al. Gene expression and protein length influence codon usage and rates of sequence evolution in Populus tremula. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.
[21] Wen-Hsiung Li,et al. Mammalian housekeeping genes evolve more slowly than tissue-specific genes. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.
[22] B. Charlesworth,et al. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. , 1993, Genetics.
[23] Eugene V Koonin,et al. No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[24] J. M. Comeron,et al. Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[25] Alex Wong,et al. Phylogenetic incongruence in the Drosophila melanogaster species group. , 2007, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[26] J. Parsch,et al. Positive correlation between evolutionary rate and recombination rate in Drosophila genes with male-biased expression. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[27] A. E. Hirsh,et al. Protein dispensability and rate of evolution , 2001, Nature.
[28] Sudhir Kumar,et al. Gene Expression Intensity Shapes Evolutionary Rates of the Proteins Encoded by the Vertebrate Genome , 2004, Genetics.
[29] C. Wilke,et al. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[30] M. King,et al. Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. , 1975, Science.
[31] J. Dow,et al. Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease , 2007, Nature Genetics.
[32] Dennis P Wall,et al. A simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[33] Ziheng Yang. Inference of selection from multiple species alignments. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.
[34] B. Charlesworth,et al. Reduced efficacy of selection in regions of the Drosophila genome that lack crossing over , 2007, Genome Biology.
[35] B. Charlesworth,et al. Intron Size and Exon Evolution in Drosophila , 2005, Genetics.
[36] L. Duret,et al. Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.
[37] Z. Yang,et al. Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.
[38] Lauren M McIntyre,et al. Common pattern of evolution of gene expression level and protein sequence in Drosophila. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.
[39] J. M. Comeron,et al. Selective and Mutational Patterns Associated With Gene Expression in Humans , 2004, Genetics.
[40] Laurence D. Hurst,et al. Genomic function (communication arising): Rate of evolution and gene dispensability , 2003, Nature.
[41] B. Blencowe. Exonic splicing enhancers: mechanism of action, diversity and role in human genetic diseases. , 2000, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[42] A. E. Hirsh,et al. Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[43] M. Kreitman,et al. The correlation between intron length and recombination in drosophila. Dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces. , 2000, Genetics.
[44] S. Muse,et al. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[45] W. Wong,et al. Bayes empirical bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[46] M. Nachman,et al. Rates of protein evolution are positively correlated with developmental timing of expression during mouse spermatogenesis. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[47] Dmitri A Petrov,et al. Genomic Heterogeneity of Background Substitutional Patterns in Drosophila melanogaster , 2005, Genetics.
[48] A. E. Hirsh,et al. Evolutionary Rate in the Protein Interaction Network , 2002, Science.
[49] H. Akashi,et al. Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. , 1995, Genetics.
[50] Laurence D. Hurst,et al. Do essential genes evolve slowly? , 1999, Current Biology.
[51] Rob J. Kulathinal,et al. Evolution in the Fast Lane: Rapidly Evolving Sex-Related Genes in Drosophila , 2007, Genetics.
[52] Matthew W. Hahn,et al. Molecular Evolution in Large Genetic Networks: Does Connectivity Equal Constraint? , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[53] Sudhir Kumar,et al. Constraint and turnover in sex-biased gene expression in the genus Drosophila , 2007, Nature.
[54] Ben-Yang Liao,et al. Impacts of gene essentiality, expression pattern, and gene compactness on the evolutionary rate of mammalian proteins. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.
[55] Araxi O. Urrutia,et al. Splicing and the Evolution of Proteins in Mammals , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[56] W. G. Hill,et al. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. , 1966, Genetical research.
[57] B. Charlesworth,et al. Correlated Evolution of Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Sites in Drosophila , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[58] Z. Yang,et al. Rates of nucleotide substitution and mammalian nuclear gene evolution. Approximate and maximum-likelihood methods lead to different conclusions. , 2000, Genetics.
[59] G. McVean,et al. The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation. , 2000, Genetics.
[60] S. Teichmann. The constraints protein-protein interactions place on sequence divergence. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[61] B. Charlesworth,et al. Background Selection in Single Genes May Explain Patterns of Codon Bias , 2007, Genetics.
[62] Ziheng Yang,et al. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..
[63] L. Pauling,et al. Evolutionary Divergence and Convergence in Proteins , 1965 .
[64] N. Goldman,et al. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[65] S. Carroll,et al. Repeated morphological evolution through cis-regulatory changes in a pleiotropic gene , 2006, Nature.
[66] Bernardo Lemos,et al. Evolution of proteins and gene expression levels are coupled in Drosophila and are independently associated with mRNA abundance, protein length, and number of protein-protein interactions. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[67] Ronald W. Davis,et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.
[68] Jianzhi Zhang,et al. Significant impact of protein dispensability on the instantaneous rate of protein evolution. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[69] Doron Lancet,et al. Genome-wide midrange transcription profiles reveal expression level relationships in human tissue specification , 2005, Bioinform..
[70] L. Duret,et al. Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[71] R. A. Fisher,et al. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .
[72] Heng Tao Shen,et al. Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.
[73] A. Betancourt,et al. Linkage limits the power of natural selection in Drosophila , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[74] J. Parsch,et al. Widespread Adaptive Evolution of Drosophila Genes With Sex-Biased Expression , 2006, Genetics.
[75] Wei-Lun Hsu,et al. Proportion of solvent-exposed amino acids in a protein and rate of protein evolution. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.
[76] D. Bachtrog. Adaptation shapes patterns of genome evolution on sexual and asexual chromosomes in Drosophila , 2003, Nature Genetics.
[77] D. Presgraves,et al. Recombination Enhances Protein Adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster , 2005, Current Biology.
[78] John Maynard Smith,et al. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. , 1974, Genetical research.
[79] Brian Charlesworth,et al. Genome Evolution: Recombination Speeds Up Adaptive Evolution , 2003, Current Biology.
[80] C. Wilke,et al. A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.
[81] Eduardo P C Rocha,et al. An analysis of determinants of amino acids substitution rates in bacterial proteins. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.
[82] John D. Storey,et al. Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[83] M. Kreitman,et al. Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection. , 2002, Genetics.
[84] Melanie A. Huntley,et al. Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny , 2007, Nature.