The Sovereign Limits of Global Civil Society: A Comparison of NGO Participation in UN World Conferences on the Environment, Human Rights, and Women

The increased visibility of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and social movements at the international level invites continuing evaluation of the extent and significance of the role they now play in world politics. While the presence of such new actors is easily demonstrated, international relations scholars have debated their significance. The authors argue that the concept of global civil society sets a more demanding standard for the evaluation of transnational political processes than has been applied in prior accounts of transnational activity. Further, most empirical studies of this activity have focused on a limited number of NGOs within a single issue-area. Using three recent UN world conferences as examples of mutual encounters between state-dominated international politics and global civic politics, the authors develop the concept of global civil society to provide a theoretical foundation for a systematic empirical assessment of transnational relations concerning the environment, human rights, and women at the global level.

[1]  S. Staggenborg,et al.  Frontiers in Social Movement Theory , 1992 .

[2]  Mark Traugott,et al.  Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action. , 1996 .

[3]  Robert D. Benford,et al.  Master-frames and cycles of protest , 1992 .

[4]  P. Taylor,et al.  Global Issues in the United Nations' Framework , 1989 .

[5]  L. Diamond,et al.  Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives , 1999 .

[6]  J. Peters,et al.  Women's Rights Human Rights International Feminist Perspectives , 1995 .

[7]  A. Fraser.  The U.n. Decade For Women: Documents And Dialogue , 1987 .

[8]  Francesca Polletta,et al.  Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics , 1998 .

[9]  R. Lipschutz.  Reconstructing World Politics: The Emergence of Global Civil Society , 1992 .

[10]  Thomas Risse-Kappen,et al.  Bringing Transnational Relations Back in: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions , 1995 .

[11]  P. Willetts.  From Stockholm to Rio and beyond: the impact of the environmental movement on the United Nations consultative arrangements for NGOs , 1996, Review of International Studies.

[12]  Douglas A. Chalmers,et al.  The new politics of inequality in Latin America : rethinking participation and representation , 1997 .

[13]  T. Weiss,et al.  NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance , 1996 .

[14]  P. Wapner,et al.  Environmental activism and world civic politics , 1996 .

[15]  A. Clark.  Non-Governmental Organizations and Their Influence on International Society , 1995 .

[16]  Thomas Risse-Kappen.  Bringing transnational relations back in: Bringing transnational relations back in: introduction , 1995 .

[17]  D. Lumsdaine.  Moral Vision in International Politics: The Foreign Aid Regime, 1949-1989 , 1993 .

[18]  M. Shaw.  Civil Society and Global Politics: Beyond a Social Movements Approach , 1994 .

[19]  E. Márquez Mayaudón.  [The Stockholm conference on the human environment]. , 1972, Salud publica de Mexico.

[20]  Women's Rights.  The Human Rights Watch global report on women's human rights , 1995 .

[21]  The International Commission of Jurists: Global Advocates for Human Rights , 1994 .

[22]  C. Bunch,et al.  Demanding Accountability : The Global Campaign and Vienna Tribunal for Women's Human Rights , 1994 .

[23]  A. Rouillon,et al.  The role of nongovernmental organizations , 1993 .

[24]  T. Weiss.  The United Nations and Changing World Politics , 1994 .

[25]  William M. Lafferty,et al.  Democracy and the Environment , 1996 .

[26]  Mark F. Imber.  Environment, Security and UN Reform , 1994 .

[27]  K. Boyle.  Stock-taking on Human Rights: The World Conference on Human Rights, Vienna 1993 , 1995 .

[28]  P. Wapner,et al.  Politics beyond the State Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics , 1995, World Politics.

[29]  Jean Louise Cohen,et al.  Civil Society and Political Theory , 2020, Crime, Inequality and the State.

[30]  S. Tarrow.  Cycles of Collective Action: Between Moments of Madness and the Repertoire of Contention , 1993 .