Human Capital Pricing Equations with an Application to Estimating the Effect of Schooling Quality on Earnings

This paper formulates and estimates alternative models for the pricing of labor services. We present economic models that rationalize empirical specifications in the literature and we offer evidence on the validity of those specifications. Widely used efficiency units models of labor services are inconsistent with evidence from the U.S. labor market. A model of heterogeneous skills provides a more accurate description of earnings data. We present evidence that the pursuit of comparative advantage and selective migration are important features of the U.S. labor market. When these features are included in the model, the only support for an effect of schooling quality on earnings is through the return to college education. Three interactions are empirically important in explaining log wage equations: (A) between schooling quality and education, (B) between regional labor market shocks and education and (C) between region-of-residence and regionof-birth. Because of this third interaction, which can arise from comparative advantage in the labor market, no unique quality effect on returns to education can be defined independently of the market in which it is used.

[1]  Robert J. Willis,et al.  Chapter 10 Wage determinants: A survey and reinterpretation of human capital earnings functions , 1986 .

[2]  David Card,et al.  School Quality and Black-White Relative Earnings: A Direct Assessment , 1991 .

[3]  A. Oswald,et al.  The Wage Curve , 1989 .

[4]  J. Heckman,et al.  Heterogeneity, Aggregation, and Market Wage Functions: An Empirical Model of Self-Selection in the Labor Market , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  J. Mincer.  Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income Distribution , 1958, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Y. Ben-Porath.  The Production of Human Capital and the Life Cycle of Earnings , 1967, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Randomization and Social Policy Evaluation , 1991 .

[8]  M. Sattinger.  Capital and the distribution of labor earnings , 1981 .

[9]  James J. Heckman,et al.  The Importance of Bundling in a Gorman-Lancaster Model of Earnings , 1987 .

[10]  Gary Solon,et al.  Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education , 1987 .

[11]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Productivity Gains from Geographic Concentration of Human Capital: Evidence from the Cities , 1991 .

[12]  Frank P. Stafford,et al.  Social Returns to Quantity and Quality of Schooling , 1973 .

[13]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  What's Really behind the SAT-Score Decline?. , 1992 .

[14]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Assessing the Case for Social Experiments , 1995 .

[15]  P. Wachtel.  The Effect of Earnings of School and College Investment Expenditures , 1976 .

[16]  Michael Sattinger,et al.  Assignment Models of the Distribution of Earnings , 1993 .

[17]  J. Tinbergen.  Income distribution: Analysis and policies , 1975 .

[18]  B. Chiswick.  Income inequality: Regional analyses within a human capital framework , 1974 .

[19]  J. Behrman.  The quality of schooling : quantity alone is misleading , 1983 .