11C-choline PET/CT and whole-body MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging for patients with recurrent prostate cancer

Purpose To compare the detection efficacy of 11C-choline positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) with whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with suspected recurrent prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Fifty-seven patients (mean age 68, range 54-80 years) underwent 11C-choline PET/CT and MRI using T1-weighted (T1w), short-tau inversion recovery (STIR), and DWI. Two readers visually rated suspicious lesions on a 5-point scale in 20 different regions. Clinical follow-up and histopathology served as the standard of reference (SOR). Results Fifty patients (mean PSA 29.9, range 1.0-670 ng/mL) had at least one positive lesion according to the SOR. Twenty-four patients had local recurrence (LR), 27 had lymph node (LN) involvement, and 22 had bone metastases. The overall detection rates for PET/CT and MRI on a patient basis were 94% and 88%, respectively (p = 0.07). The PSA level (>2 ng/mL vs ≤2 ng/mL) significantly influenced the overall performance of PET/CT (p = 0.003) and MRI (p = 0.03). PET/CT was significantly superior to MRI in detecting LR (p = 0.03) and bone metastasis (p = 0.02). We found no difference with respect to the detection of LN metastasis (p = 0.65). Conclusion 11C-choline PET/CT was superior in the detection of local recurrence and bone metastasis on a regional basis. Whole-body MRI including DWI showed similar diagnostic accuracy only for detecting lymph node metastases. Compared with 11C-choline PET/CT, therefore, whole-body MRI including DWI cannot serve as alternative imaging modality for restaging prostate cancer.

[1]  Evis Sala,et al.  Combined Whole Body and Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a 1‐Step Approach to the Simultaneous Assessment of Local Recurrence and Metastatic Disease after Radical Prostatectomy , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[2]  D. Rubello,et al.  11C-Choline PET/CT Identifies Osteoblastic and Osteolytic Lesions in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer , 2015, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[3]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[4]  C. Catalano,et al.  Prostate cancer: 1HMRS-DCEMR at 3T versus [(18)F]choline PET/CT in the detection of local prostate cancer recurrence in men with biochemical progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[5]  U. Haberkorn,et al.  [68Ga]Gallium-labelled PSMA ligand as superior PET tracer for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison with 18F-FECH , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  Prospective evaluation of 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the nodal staging of prostate cancer with a high risk of lymph node metastases. , 2011, European urology.

[7]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Diagnostic value of whole‐body magnetic resonance imaging for bone metastases: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  A. Kawashima,et al.  The utility of 11C-choline PET/CT for imaging prostate cancer: a pictorial guide. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Influence of (11)C-choline PET/CT on the treatment planning for salvage radiation therapy in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  D. Collins,et al.  Optimising diffusion weighted MRI for imaging metastatic and myeloma bone disease and assessing reproducibility , 2011, European Radiology.

[11]  Michael Souvatzoglou,et al.  Radionuclide and hybrid imaging of recurrent prostate cancer. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  M. Reiser,et al.  Diffusion and perfusion imaging of bone marrow. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[13]  Wei Chen,et al.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging vs. FDG-PET for the detection of non-small-cell lung cancer. How do they measure up? , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  J. Mohler The 2010 NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology on prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[15]  C. Ganter,et al.  Preliminary Results for Characterization of Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Patients With Prostate Cancer by Diffusion-Weighted MR-Imaging , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[16]  Jian Xu,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted imaging of the liver: Comparison of navigator triggered and breathhold acquisitions , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  C. Nanni,et al.  Influence of Trigger PSA and PSA Kinetics on 11C-Choline PET/CT Detection Rate in Patients with Biochemical Relapse After Radical Prostatectomy , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  S. Matsumoto,et al.  Detection of bone metastases in non‐small cell lung cancer patients: Comparison of whole‐body diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), whole‐body MR imaging without and with DWI, whole‐body FDG‐PET/CT, and bone scintigraphy , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  K. Katahira,et al.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[20]  Peter Choyke,et al.  Challenges in clinical prostate cancer: role of imaging. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  P. Choyke,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. , 2009, Neoplasia.

[22]  Comprehensive imaging of tumor recurrence in breast cancer patients using whole-body MRI at 1.5 and 3 T compared to FDG–PET–CT: Schmidt GP, Baur-Melnyk A, Haug A, et al (Univ Hosp Munich-Grosshadern, Germany; et al) Eur J Radiol 65:47-58, 2008§ , 2009 .

[23]  N. Blumstein,et al.  Prostate carcinoma: diffusion-weighted imaging as potential alternative to conventional MR and 11C-choline PET/CT for detection of bone metastases. , 2008, Radiology.

[24]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  [(11)C]Choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging and restaging of patients with advanced prostate cancer. , 2008, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[25]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  Technology Insight: advances in molecular imaging and an appraisal of PET/CT scanning , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[26]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Comprehensive imaging of tumor recurrence in breast cancer patients using whole-body MRI at 1.5 and 3 T compared to FDG-PET-CT. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[27]  F. Fazio,et al.  Detection of lymph-node metastases with integrated [11C]choline PET/CT in patients with PSA failure after radical retropubic prostatectomy: results confirmed by open pelvic-retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. , 2007, European urology.

[28]  H. Schild,et al.  Diffusion-weighted whole-body MR imaging with background body signal suppression: a feasibility study at 3.0 Tesla , 2007, European Radiology.

[29]  P. Walsh Suspected local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: endorectal coil MR imaging. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[30]  J. Debatin,et al.  Whole-body MR imaging: evaluation of patients for metastases. , 2004, Radiology.

[31]  T. Takahara,et al.  Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. , 2004, Radiation medicine.

[32]  A. Hanlon,et al.  A comparison of the single and double factor high-risk models for risk assignment of prostate cancer treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  M. Terris,et al.  Time trends in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results of the SEARCH database. , 2003, Urology.

[34]  T. Hara 11C-choline and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose in tumor imaging with positron emission tomography. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[35]  H. Svanholm,et al.  Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic , 1989, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.