Improving the usefulness of concept maps as a research tool for science education

The search for authentic science research tools to evaluate student understanding in a hybrid learning environment with a large multimedia component has resulted in the use of concept maps as a representation of student's knowledge organization. One hundred and seventy third‐semester introductory university‐level engineering students represented their understanding related to the atom in a concept map. A qualitative analysis of the data presented a more informative and complete picture of students' understanding as compared with most prominent scoring techniques in the literature. The detailed analysis method is illustrated by means of some students' concept maps and the overall results of the entire student population are discussed. The most striking difference between common and more insightful maps is the inclusion of additional clusters describing models of the atom, beyond the clusters that just describe the elements of atoms (e.g. protons, electrons, etc.) and their characteristics.

[1]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[2]  J. Stanley,et al.  Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1957 .

[3]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  F. Marton Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[5]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[6]  Reinders Duit,et al.  Bibliography. Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education. 2nd Edition. , 1988 .

[7]  R. Glaser,et al.  Learning Theory and the Study of Instruction , 1989 .

[8]  J. Novak Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education , 1990 .

[9]  Pinchas Tamir,et al.  The relations between disciplinary and pedagogical knowledge and the length of teaching experience of biology and geography teachers , 1990 .

[10]  J. Mintzes,et al.  The concept map as a research tool: Exploring conceptual change in biology , 1990 .

[11]  Reinders Duit,et al.  Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education. Bibliography. 3rd Edition. IPN Reports-in-Brief = Alltagsvorstellungen und Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht. Bibliographie. 3. Auflage. IPN-Kurzberichte. , 1991 .

[12]  C. Boyle,et al.  Studying conceptual change in learning physics , 1992 .

[13]  John M. Wilson,et al.  The predictive validity of concept-mapping: Relationships to measures of achievements , 1993 .

[14]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[15]  G. O. Esiobu,et al.  Effects of concept and vee mappings under three learning modes on students' cognitive achievement in ecology and genetics , 1995 .

[16]  R. Glaser,et al.  Knowledge-based cognition and performance assessment in the science classroom , 1996 .

[17]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Problems and Issues in the Use of Concept Maps in Science Assessment. , 1996 .

[18]  J. Mintzes,et al.  Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology , 1997 .

[19]  Els Van Zele,et al.  Testing science and engineering students: the force concept inventory , 1998 .

[20]  L. McDermott,et al.  Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research , 1999 .

[21]  H. Suen,et al.  Concept Map Assessment of Classroom Learning: Reliability, Validity, and Logistical Practicality , 1999 .

[22]  Els Van Zele,et al.  Evaluation of a New Instructional Model and Learningware for an Introductory Quantum Physics Course , 2001 .

[23]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept‐mapping techniques* , 2001 .

[24]  J. Mintzes,et al.  Assessing science understanding : a human constructivist view , 2005 .