Spectral Components Analysis: A Bridge between Spectral Observations and Agrometeorological Crop Models

Spectral observations have been acknowledged to indicate general plant conditions over large areas but have yet to be exploited in connection with agrometeorological crop models. One reason is that it is not yet appreciated how periodic spectral observations of row-cropped and natural plant canopies, as expressed by vegetation indices (VI), can provide information on important crop model parameters, such as leaf area index (LAI) and absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR). Two experiments were conducted under AgRISTARS sponsorship, one with cotton and one with spring wheat, specifically to determine the relationships for each term in the " spectral components analysis" identity \begin{equation*} LAI/VI \times APAR/LAI = APAR/VI.\end{equation*} LAI and APAR could, indeed, be well estimated from vegetation indices such as normalized difference(ND) and perpendicular vegetation index (PVI)¿apparently because of the close relation between the VI and amount of photosynthetically active tissue in the canopy. APAR and VI measurements are similarly affected by solar zenith angle (SZA), and LAI can be divided by cos SZA at the time of the VI and APAR measurements to achieve correspondence. APAR, ND, and PVI plotted against LAI all asymptote to limiting values in the same way yield does as LAI exceeds 5, further linking canopy development to yield capability. In summary, the spectral components analysis results presented add credence to the information conveyed by spectral canopy observations about plant development and yield, and establish a bridge between remote observations and agrometeorological crop modeling through the variables of mutual concern, LAI, biomass, and yield.

[1]  E. Kanemasu,et al.  Leaf Area Index Estimates for Wheat from LANDSAT and Their Implications for Evapotranspiration and Crop Modeling1 , 1979 .

[2]  E. T. Kanemasu,et al.  Assessing the interception of photosynthetically active radiation in winter wheat , 1983 .

[3]  Jerry L. Hatfield,et al.  Intercepted photosynthetically active radiation estimated by spectral reflectance , 1984 .

[4]  M. Bauer,et al.  Spectral Estimates of Intercepted Solar Radiation by Corn and Soybean Canopies , 1982 .

[5]  C J Tucker,et al.  A three-band hand-held radiometer for field use. , 1981, Science.

[6]  G. F. Arkin,et al.  Remotely-sensed spectral indicators of sorghum development and their use in growth modeling , 1982 .

[7]  C. Wiegand,et al.  Leaf Area, Light Interception, and Yield Estimates from Spectral Components Analysis1 , 1984 .

[8]  D. Kimes Modeling the directional reflectance from complete homogeneous vegetation canopies with various leaf-orientation distributions , 1984 .

[9]  J. Aase Relationship Between Leaf Area and Dry Matter in Winter Wheat1 , 1978 .

[10]  E. C. Large GROWTH STAGES IN CEREALS ILLUSTRATION OF THE FEEKES SCALE , 1954 .

[11]  A. C. York Response of Cotton to Mepiquat Chloride with Varying N Rates and Plant Populations1 , 1983 .

[12]  F. H. Siddoway,et al.  Spring Wheat Yield Estimates from Spectral Reflectance Measurements , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  Spectral estimates of solar radiation intercepted by corn canopies. , 1983 .

[14]  A. J. Richardsons,et al.  DISTINGUISHING VEGETATION FROM SOIL BACKGROUND INFORMATION , 1977 .

[15]  C. L. Wiegand,et al.  Diurnal patterns of bidirectional vegetation indices for wheat canopies , 1986 .

[16]  J. Norman,et al.  Radiative Transfer in an Array of Canopies1 , 1983 .

[17]  Ghassem R. Asrar,et al.  Intercepted photosynthetically active radiation in wheat canopies estimated by spectral reflectance. [Phoenix, Arizona] , 1982 .

[18]  A. Richardson,et al.  Measurement of reflectance factors under daily and intermittent irradiance variations. , 1981, Applied optics.