Adaptive configuration and control in an ATR system
暂无分享,去创建一个
Today's ATR is constructed via inefficient and suboptimal system configuration and training. The process of configuring an ATR is currently very labor intensive, subjective, and inaccurate, as is the process of training an ATR for a particular mission. To cure this deficiency, what is desired is an automated method of configuration and training which is capable of searching the N-dimensional space of modules, algorithms, and parameter values to produce ATR algorithm suites which perform best in each trained scenario. Also, today's ATR is only capable of a limited amount of adaptation to sensed (or otherwise obtained) changes in the environment. To improve the adaptibility of ATR processing and thereby improve accuracy and robustness, what is desired is a high-level control structure which enables system adaptation via changes in parameter values and changes in algorithms (at the component and at the 'suite' level). The Honeywell effort is producing a system for Adaptive Configuration and Control (ACC) of an ATR system which addresses the above described problems. The software system is using the machine learning technique of Genetic Algorithms to autonomously and optimally perform configuration and training and it is using case-based reasoning to provide run-time configuration and control of the ATR system. This paper provides an overview of the ACC system, describes its operation, and describes the benefits it provides to ATR systems.
[1] Jaime G. Carbonell,et al. Derivational Analogy and Its Role in Problem Solving , 1983, AAAI.
[2] Janet L. Kolodner,et al. Extending Problem Solver Capabilities Through Case-Based Inference , 1987 .
[3] R. Bareiss,et al. Supporting Start-to-Finish Development of Knowledge Bases , 2005, Machine Learning.
[4] Kevin D. Ashley,et al. A case-based approach to modeling legal expertise , 1988, IEEE Expert.