iVR for the geosciences

Field trips are an essential part in many disciplines taught in K12 STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) education inside and outside the US such as geography, geosciences, and architecture. Field trips foster embodied experiences of places where students can be situated into an informal learning environment. However, field trips are underutilized due to numerous constraints, a situation that current mass development in immersive technologies promises to eliminate. This paper presents an educational project that aims at creating and empirically evaluating virtual reality (VR) experiences for the geosciences: an interactive volcano experience based on LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) and image data of Iceland's Thrihnukar volcano. This work-in-progress prototype addresses the lack of content and tools for immersive virtual reality (iVR) in geoscientific education and research and how to make it easier to integrate iVR into classroom experiences. It makes use of environmentally sensed data such that interaction and linked content can be integrated into a single experience. We discuss our workflows as well as methods and authoring tools for iVR analysis and creation of virtual educational experiences. These methods and tools aim to enhance the utility of geospatial data from repositories such as OpenTopography.org through unlocking treasure-troves of geospatial data for VR applications. Their enhanced accessibility in education and research for the geosciences and beyond will benefit geoscientists and educators who cannot be expected to be VR and 3D application experts.

[1]  Tanya Furman,et al.  Inside the volcano: The how and why of Thrihnukagigur volcano, Iceland , 2015 .

[2]  Steven A. Marchette,et al.  Multiple Views of Space: Continuous Visual Flow Enhances Small-Scale Spatial Learning , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Andrea Gaggioli,et al.  The Potential of Virtual Reality for the Investigation of Awe , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[4]  Shamus P. Smith,et al.  Pedagogical theory and embodiment: some provocations for virtual and augmented reality in education , 2016 .

[5]  Wolfgang Schwanghart,et al.  Immersive 3D geovisualization in higher education , 2015 .

[6]  Alexander Klippel,et al.  Perceptually Induced Distortions in Cognitive Maps , 2004, Spatial Cognition.

[7]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Where Am I? How Can I Get There? Impact of Navigability and Narrative Transportation on Spatial Presence , 2011, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Embodied interaction with a 3D versus 2D mobile map , 2009, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[9]  Filip Biljecki,et al.  Applications of 3D City Models: State of the Art Review , 2015, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[10]  Chris North,et al.  Realizing embodied interaction for visual analytics through large displays , 2007, Comput. Graph..

[11]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Rick L. Bunch,et al.  The Cognitive Load of Geographic Information , 2006 .

[13]  Zhiguo Zhou,et al.  A Panoramic Geology Field Trip System Using Image-Based Rendering , 2016, 2016 IEEE 40th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC).

[14]  David Waller,et al.  Handbook of spatial cognition , 2013 .