INRIA-LEARs participation to ImageCLEF 2009

We participated in the Photo Annotation and Photo Retrieval tasks of ImageCLEF 2009. For the Photo Annotation task we compared TagProp, SVMs, and logistic discriminant (LD) models. TagProp is a nearest-neighbor based system that learns a distance measure between images to define the neighbors. In the second system a separate SVM is trained for each annotation word. The third system treats mutually exclusive terms more naturally by assigning a probabilities to the mutually exclusive terms that sum up to one. The experiments show that (i) both TagProp and SVMs benefit from a distance combination learned with TagProp, (ii) the TagProp system, which has very few trainable parameters, performs somewhat worse than SVM in terms of EEC and AUC but better than the SVM runs in terms of the hierarchical image annotation score (HS), and (iii) LD is best in terms of HS and close to the SVM run in terms of EEC and AUC. In our experiments for the Photo Retrieval task we compare a system using only visual search, with systems that include a simple form of text matching, and/or duplicate removal to increase the diversity in the search results. For the visual search we use our image matching system that is efficient and yields state-of-the-art image retrieval results. From the evaluation of the results we find that the adding some form of text matching is crucial for retrieval, and that (unexpectedly) the duplicate removal step did not improve results.

[1]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Video Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[2]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[3]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Scale & Affine Invariant Interest Point Detectors , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[5]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[6]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Coloring Local Feature Extraction , 2006, ECCV.

[7]  Michael Isard,et al.  Object retrieval with large vocabularies and fast spatial matching , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[9]  Manik Varma,et al.  Learning The Discriminative Power-Invariance Trade-Off , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[10]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Hamming Embedding and Weak Geometric Consistency for Large Scale Image Search , 2008, ECCV.

[11]  Stefanie Nowak,et al.  Overview of the CLEF 2009 Large Scale - Visual Concept Detection and Annotation Task , 2009, CLEF.

[12]  C. Schmid,et al.  On the burstiness of visual elements , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[13]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Is that you? Metric learning approaches for face identification , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[14]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  TagProp: Discriminative metric learning in nearest neighbor models for image auto-annotation , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[15]  Mark Sanderson,et al.  Diversity in Photo Retrieval: Overview of the ImageCLEFPhoto Task 2009 , 2009, CLEF.

[16]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .