Lay Rationalism: Individual Differences in using Reason versus Feelings to Guide Decisions

People have a lay notion of rationality—that is, the notion of using reason rather than feelings to guide decisions. Yet people differ in the degree to which they actually base their decisions on reason versus feelings. This individual difference variable is potentially general and important but is largely overlooked. The present research (1) introduces the construct of lay rationalism to capture this individual difference variable and distinguishes it from other individual difference variables; (2) develops a short, easy-to-implement scale to measure lay rationalism and demonstrates the validity and reliability of the scale; and (3) shows that lay rationalism, as measured by the scale, can predict a variety of consumer-relevant behaviors, including product preferences, savings decisions, and donation behaviors.

[1]  Nicholas Grigoriou,et al.  Consciousness of Social Face: The Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Desire to Gain Face Versus Fear of Losing Face , 2011, The Journal of social psychology.

[2]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[3]  J. Schofield Where is the Prophet , 1969 .

[4]  E. Stotland,et al.  An experimental investigation of need for cognition. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  H. Clayton Foushee,et al.  The role of dispositional empathy and social evaluation in the empathic mediation of helping. , 1981 .

[6]  K. Barchard Emotional and social intelligence : examining its place in the nomological network , 2001 .

[7]  B. Rimer,et al.  General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[8]  W. Bearden,et al.  Consumer Self‐Confidence: Refinements in Conceptualization and Measurement , 2001 .

[9]  Michael J. Liersch,et al.  Misunderstanding Savings Growth: Implications for Retirement Savings Behavior , 2011 .

[10]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Tightwads and Spendthrifts , 2007 .

[11]  Walter Mischel,et al.  From good intentions to willpower. , 1996 .

[12]  Hal E. Hershfield,et al.  Increasing Saving Behavior Through Age-Progressed Renderings of the Future Self , 2011, JMR, Journal of marketing research.

[13]  Marsha L. Richins,et al.  A Consumer Values Orientation for Materialism and Its Measurement: Scale Development and Validation , 1992 .

[14]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations : Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making , 1997 .

[15]  Joel Herche,et al.  Reversed-polarity items and scale unidimensionality , 1996 .

[16]  J. Haidt The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[17]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  A Dual Self Model of Impulse Control , 2004, The American economic review.

[18]  E. Okada Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods , 2005 .

[19]  S. Czellár,et al.  The Importance of a General Measure of Brand Engagement on Market Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale , 2009 .

[20]  E. Hirschman,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions , 1982 .

[21]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[22]  R. Thaler Psychology and Savings Policies , 1994 .

[23]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[24]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Self-Signaling and the Costs and Benefits of Temptation in Consumer Choice , 2012 .

[25]  Fang Yu,et al.  Lay Rationalism and Inconsistency between Predicted Experience and Decision , 2003 .

[26]  Dennis W. Rook,et al.  Normative Influences on Impulsive Buying Behavior , 1995 .

[27]  James G. Clawson Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 2008 .

[28]  Ed Diener,et al.  Affect intensity and reactions to daily life events. , 1986 .

[29]  William T. Ross,et al.  Individual Differences in Brand Schematicity , 2012 .

[30]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Asymmetric option effects on ease of choice criticism and defense , 2012 .

[31]  S. Epstein,et al.  Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Losing Control: How and Why People Fail at Self-Regulation , 1994 .

[33]  Gergana Y. Nenkov,et al.  Considering the Future: The Conceptualization and Measurement of Elaboration on Potential Outcomes , 2008 .

[34]  R. Belk Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World , 1985 .

[35]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Lay Rationalism and Inconsistency between Predicted Experience and Decision , 2003 .

[36]  P. Foot The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect , 2020, The Doctrine of Double Effect.

[37]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Decisions by Rules: The Case of Unwillingness to Pay for Beneficial Delays , 2006 .

[38]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Handbook of Marketing Scales: Multi-Item Measures for Marketing and Consumer Behavior Research , 1993 .

[39]  D. Brinberg,et al.  The “Response-to-Failure” Scale: Predicting Behavior following Initial Self-Control Failure , 2012 .

[40]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[41]  R. Baumeister,et al.  High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[42]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Maximizing Versus Satisficing : Happiness Is a Matter of Choice , 2002 .

[43]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  General Evaluability Theory , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[44]  Scot Burton,et al.  Distinguishing Coupon Proneness from Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective , 1990 .

[45]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  A Generalizable Scale of Propensity to Plan: The Long and the Short of Planning for Time and for Money , 2010 .

[46]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability , 2003 .

[47]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  Harnessing Our Inner Angels and Demons: What We Have Learned About Want/Should Conflicts and How That Knowledge Can Help Us Reduce Short-Sighted Decision Making , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[48]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  Work or Fun? How Task Construal and Completion Influence Regulatory Behavior , 2011 .

[49]  Amar Cheema,et al.  Earmarking and Partitioning: Increasing Saving by Low-Income Households , 2010 .

[50]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  How (and where) does moral judgment work? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Specification Seeking: How Product Specifications Influence Consumer Preference , 2008 .

[52]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[53]  Marsha L. Richins The Material Values Scale: Measurement Properties and Development of a Short Form , 2004 .

[54]  John G. Lynch,et al.  When do you Want It? Time, Decisions, and Public Policy , 2006 .

[55]  J. Meindl,et al.  Grounding Leadership Theory and Research: Issues, Perspectives, and Methods. Leadership Horizons Series. , 2002 .

[56]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. , 2007 .

[57]  R. Larsen,et al.  Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review , 1987 .

[58]  R. Dhar,et al.  Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods , 2000 .

[59]  Michael Hoerger,et al.  Development and validation of the Delaying Gratification Inventory. , 2011, Psychological assessment.

[60]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[61]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Bringing meaning to numbers: the impact of evaluative categories on decisions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[62]  J. Ray Reviving the problem of acquiescent response bias. , 1983 .

[63]  Cynthia Barnhart,et al.  Consumption Self-Control by Rationing Purchase Quantities of Virtue and Vice , 1998 .

[64]  D. Marlowe,et al.  A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. , 1960, Journal of consulting psychology.

[65]  M. Bazerman,et al.  negotiating with Yourself and Losing: Making Decisions with Competing Internal Preferences , 1998 .

[66]  James M. Dabbs,et al.  Sex, Group Size and Helping in Three Cities* , 1975 .

[67]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[68]  Katherine L. Milkman Unsure What the Future Will Bring? You May Overindulge: Uncertainty Increases the Appeal of Wants over Shoulds , 2011 .

[69]  W. Mischel,et al.  Delay of gratification in children. , 1989, Science.

[70]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[71]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Form versus Function: How the Intensities of Specific Emotions Evoked in Functional versus Hedonic Trade-Offs Mediate Product Preferences , 2007 .

[72]  I. Simonson,et al.  Earning the Right to Indulge: Effort as a Determinant of Customer Preferences toward Frequency Program Rewards , 2002 .

[73]  Scott T. Allison,et al.  Social Value Orientation and Helping Behavior1 , 1989 .

[74]  J. Patton,et al.  Toward a Conceptualization of Impulsivity: Components across the Behavioral and Self-Report Domains. , 1987, Multivariate behavioral research.

[75]  Drazen Prelec,et al.  The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt , 1998 .

[76]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Time-inconsistent Preferences and Consumer Self-Control , 1991 .

[77]  Ellen Peters,et al.  Development and Testing of an Abbreviated Numeracy Scale: A Rasch Analysis Approach , 2012, Journal of behavioral decision making.

[78]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[79]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Licensing Effect in Consumer Choice , 2006 .

[80]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  To do or to have? That is the question. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[81]  Daniel Kahneman New challenges to the rationality assumption , 1994 .

[82]  I. B. Myers The myers-briggs type indicator , 1962 .

[83]  G. Gigerenzer Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious , 2007 .

[84]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Handbook of Marketing Scales , 1999 .

[85]  Walter Bossert,et al.  Consistency, Choice, and Rationality , 2010 .