Improving B-cell epitope prediction and its application to global antibody-antigen docking

Motivation: Antibodies are currently the most important class of biopharmaceuticals. Development of such antibody-based drugs depends on costly and time-consuming screening campaigns. Computational techniques such as antibody–antigen docking hold the potential to facilitate the screening process by rapidly providing a list of initial poses that approximate the native complex. Results: We have developed a new method to identify the epitope region on the antigen, given the structures of the antibody and the antigen—EpiPred. The method combines conformational matching of the antibody–antigen structures and a specific antibody–antigen score. We have tested the method on both a large non-redundant set of antibody–antigen complexes and on homology models of the antibodies and/or the unbound antigen structure. On a non-redundant test set, our epitope prediction method achieves 44% recall at 14% precision against 23% recall at 14% precision for a background random distribution. We use our epitope predictions to rescore the global docking results of two rigid-body docking algorithms: ZDOCK and ClusPro. In both cases including our epitope, prediction increases the number of near-native poses found among the top decoys. Availability and implementation: Our software is available from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/research/proteins/resources. Contact: deane@stats.ox.ac.uk Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

[1]  S. Wodak,et al.  Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3–5 shows progress in docking procedures , 2005, Proteins.

[2]  Hiroki Shirai,et al.  Use of amino acid composition to predict epitope residues of individual antibodies. , 2010, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[3]  Bo Yao,et al.  Conformational B-Cell Epitope Prediction on Antigen Protein Structures: A Review of Current Algorithms and Comparison with Common Binding Site Prediction Methods , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  Jiye Shi,et al.  SAbDab: the structural antibody database , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  P. Hudson,et al.  Latest technologies for the enhancement of antibody affinity. , 2006, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[6]  Jinyan Li,et al.  Antibody-Specified B-Cell Epitope Prediction in Line with the Principle of Context-Awareness , 2011, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[7]  Paolo Marcatili,et al.  PIGS: automatic prediction of antibody structures , 2008, Bioinform..

[8]  Z. Weng,et al.  ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm , 2003, Proteins.

[9]  Vasant Honavar,et al.  Recent advances in B-cell epitope prediction methods , 2010, Immunome research.

[10]  Yoonjoo Choi,et al.  FREAD revisited: Accurate loop structure prediction using a database search algorithm , 2010, Proteins.

[11]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Application of asymmetric statistical potentials to antibody-protein docking , 2012, Bioinform..

[12]  C. Deane,et al.  Antibody i-Patch prediction of the antibody binding site improves rigid local antibody-antigen docking. , 2013, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[13]  Emily Chia-Yu Su,et al.  Prediction of B-cell epitopes using evolutionary information and propensity scales , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[14]  J P Murad,et al.  Current and experimental antibody-based therapeutics: insights, breakthroughs, setbacks and future directions. , 2013, Current molecular medicine.

[15]  Jinyan Li,et al.  Mining for the antibody-antigen interacting associations that predict the B cell epitopes , 2010, BMC Structural Biology.

[16]  Mathias Hafner,et al.  One target-two different binding modes: structural insights into gevokizumab and canakinumab interactions to interleukin-1β. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  B. Matthews Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. , 1975, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[18]  Inbal Sela-Culang,et al.  The Structural Basis of Antibody-Antigen Recognition , 2013, Front. Immunol..

[19]  Charlotte M Deane,et al.  Predicting antibody complementarity determining region structures without classification. , 2011, Molecular bioSystems.

[20]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Toward high‐resolution homology modeling of antibody Fv regions and application to antibody–antigen docking , 2009, Proteins.

[21]  Morten Nielsen,et al.  Reliable B Cell Epitope Predictions: Impacts of Method Development and Improved Benchmarking , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Computer-aided antibody design , 2012, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[24]  G. Raghunathan,et al.  Antigen‐binding site anatomy and somatic mutations in antibodies that recognize different types of antigens , 2012, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[25]  Adam Godzik,et al.  Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences , 2006, Bioinform..

[26]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  SnugDock: Paratope Structural Optimization during Antibody-Antigen Docking Compensates for Errors in Antibody Homology Models , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..