Planning participants’ preferential differences under immersive virtual reality and conventional representations: An experiment of street renewal:
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Nordvik,et al. Gender Differences in Spatial Abilities and Spatial Activity Among University Students in an Egalitarian Educational System , 1998 .
[2] Olaf Schroth,et al. Evaluating presentation formats of local climate change in community planning with regard to process and outcomes , 2015 .
[3] J. Glass. Citizen participation in planning: the relationship between objectives and techniques. , 1979, Journal of the American Planning Association. American Planning Association.
[4] Kheir Al-Kodmany,et al. Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: Process, implementation, and evaluation , 1999 .
[5] Kheir Al-Kodmany,et al. Visualization Tools and Methods in Community Planning: From Freehand Sketches to Virtual Reality , 2002 .
[6] Ian J. Bateman,et al. Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change , 2009 .
[7] Jaecheol Kim,et al. Finding the Optimal D/H Ratio for an Enclosed Urban Square: Testing an Urban Design Principle Using Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation Techniques , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.
[8] G. Tress,et al. Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning—a study from Denmark , 2003 .
[9] Carissa Schively Slotterback,et al. Planners' Perspectives on Using Technology in Participatory Processes , 2011 .
[10] Ilona Heldal,et al. Supporting participation in planning new roads by using virtual reality systems , 2007, Virtual Reality.
[11] Stephen R.J. Sheppard,et al. Guidance for crystal ball gazers: developing a code of ethics for landscape visualization , 2001 .
[12] Javier Irizarry,et al. Immersive environment for improving the understanding of architectural 3D models: Comparing user spatial perception between immersive and traditional virtual reality systems , 2017 .
[13] Toby Howard,et al. Using Virtual Environment Technology to Improve Public Participation in Urban Planning Process , 2007 .
[14] Ebru Cubukcu,et al. Does the Level of Visual Detail in Virtual Environments Affect the User's Spatial Knowledge? , 2011 .
[15] Ian D. Bishop,et al. Experiential approaches to perception response in virtual worlds , 2001 .
[16] Andrew A. Lovett,et al. Using 3D visualization methods in landscape planning: An evaluation of options and practical issues , 2015 .
[17] Eckart Lange,et al. What you see is not always what you get: A qualitative, comparative analysis of ex ante visualizations with ex post photography of landscape and architectural projects , 2015 .
[18] Cam Campbell,et al. The digital workshop: exploring the use of interactive and immersive visualisation tools in participatory planning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.
[19] David Pullar,et al. Coupling 3D visualisation to qualitative assessment of built environment designs , 2001 .
[20] E. Talen. Bottom-Up GIS , 2000 .
[21] Stephen R.J. Sheppard,et al. Culture and communication: Can landscape visualization improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities? , 2006 .
[22] David Fonseca,et al. Virtual interactive innovations applied for digital urban transformations. Mixed approach , 2019, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..
[23] Daniel O. David,et al. Task difficulty of virtual reality-based assessment tools compared to classical paper-and-pencil or computerized measures: A meta-analytic approach , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[24] Brian Orland,et al. Considering virtual worlds as representations of landscape realities and as tools for landscape planning , 2001 .
[25] Harry Timmermans,et al. Evaluating Design Alternatives Using Conjoint Experiments in Virtual Reality , 2003 .
[26] Christoph Hölscher,et al. Virtual reality as an empirical research tool - Exploring user experience in a real building and a corresponding virtual model , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..
[27] Lesley Strawderman,et al. Efficacy of virtual reality in pedestrian safety research. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.
[28] Riccardo Scarpa,et al. Using virtual environments to improve the realism of choice experiments: A case study about coastal erosion management , 2017 .
[29] Ali Rezaei,et al. Comparing text-only and virtual reality discrete choice experiments of neighbourhood choice , 2017 .
[30] S. Arnstein,et al. Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .
[31] J. L. Higuera-Trujillo,et al. Psychological and physiological human responses to simulated and real environments: A comparison between Photographs, 360° Panoramas, and Virtual Reality. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.
[32] Eckart Lange,et al. Combining a participatory planning approach with a virtual landscape model for the siting of wind turbines , 2005 .
[33] Keith Chrzan,et al. Three kinds of order effects in choice-based conjoint analysis , 1994 .
[34] Carlos Granell,et al. An assessment of Public Participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil , 2010 .
[35] Ruey Long Cheu,et al. Public Preferences on the Use of Visualization in the Public Involvement Process in Transportation Planning , 2011 .
[36] Eckart Lange,et al. The limits of realism: perceptions of virtual landscapes , 2001 .
[37] John Zacharias,et al. Exploratory spatial behaviour in real and virtual environments , 2006 .
[38] Maffei Luigi,et al. On the Validity of Immersive Virtual Reality as Tool for Multisensory Evaluation of Urban Spaces , 2015 .