Damage diagnosis for complex steel truss bridges using multi-layer genetic algorithm

A considerate amount of research has proposed optimization-based approaches employing various vibration parameters for structural damage diagnosis. The damage detection by these methods is in fact a result of updating the analytical structural model in line with the current physical model. The feasibility of these approaches has been proven. But most of the verification has been done on simple structures such as beams or plates. In the application on a complex structure, such as steel truss bridges, a traditional optimization process will cost massive computational resources and lengthy convergence. This study presents a multi-layer genetic algorithm (ML-GA) to overcome the problem. Unlike the tedious convergence process in a conventional damage optimization process, in each layer, the proposed algorithm divides the GA’s population into groups with a less number of damage candidates and then, the converged population in each group evolves as an initial population of the next layer, where the groups merge to larger groups. In a damage detection process featuring ML-GA, as parallel computation can be implemented, the optimization performance and computational efficiency can be enhanced. In order to assess the proposed algorithm, the modal strain energy correlation (MSEC) has been considered as the objective function. Several damage scenarios of a complex steel truss bridge’s finite element model have been employed to evaluate the effectiveness and performance of ML-GA, against a conventional GA. In both single- and multiple-damage scenarios, the analytical and experimental study shows that the MSEC index has achieved excellent damage indication and efficiency using the proposed ML-GA, whereas the conventional GA only converges at a local solution.

[1]  D. Bernal Load Vectors for Damage Localization , 2002 .

[2]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Improved correlation-based modal strain energy method for global damage detection of truss bridge structures , 2010 .

[3]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Online damage diagnosis for civil infrastructure employing a flexibility-based approach , 2006 .

[4]  Tong Wang,et al.  A frequency–spatial domain decomposition (FSDD) method for operational modal analysis , 2010 .

[5]  J Maeck,et al.  Dynamic Bending and Torsion Stiffness Derivation from Modal Curvatures and Torsion Rates , 1999 .

[6]  Muneo Hori,et al.  A NUMERICAL STUDY OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DETECTION USING CHANGES IN THE ROTATION OF MODE SHAPES , 2002 .

[7]  Karolos M. Grigoriadis,et al.  An Optimal Hybrid Expansion—Reduction Damage Detection Method , 2003 .

[8]  Liang Wang,et al.  Innovative damage assessment of steel truss bridges using modal strain energy correlation , 2012 .

[9]  Roberto A. Osegueda,et al.  Damage localization in a space truss model using modal strain energy , 1997 .

[10]  Jan Ming Ko,et al.  Modal sensitivity analysis of Tsing Ma Bridge for structural damage detection , 2000, Smart Structures.

[11]  E. J. Williams,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DETECTION BY A SENSITIVITY AND STATISTICAL-BASED METHOD , 1998 .

[12]  Sophia Hassiotis,et al.  Identification of damage using natural frequencies and Markov parameters , 2000 .

[13]  G. D. Jeong,et al.  Assessment of structural damage from natural frequency measurements , 1993 .

[14]  Norris Stubbs,et al.  Damage Localization in Structures Without Baseline Modal Parameters , 1996 .

[15]  Wolfgang G. Luber Structural damage localization using an optimization method , 1999, Smart Structures.

[16]  Seamus D. Garvey,et al.  A COMBINED GENETIC AND EIGENSENSITIVITY ALGORITHM FOR THE LOCATION OF DAMAGE IN STRUCTURES , 1998 .

[17]  Hota V. S. GangaRao,et al.  Non-Baseline Damage Detection from Changes in Strain Energy Mode Shapes. Experiments on Armored Vehicle Launched Bridge , 2003 .

[18]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Damage detection for truss bridge structures using correlation-based structural modal strain energy , 2010 .

[19]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  Genetic algorithm in structural damage detection , 2001 .

[20]  G. D. Jeong,et al.  Identification of Stiffness Reductions Using Natural Frequencies , 1995 .

[21]  Zhengliang Li,et al.  A two-stage method to identify structural damage sites and extents by using evidence theory and micro-search genetic algorithm , 2009 .

[22]  Norris Stubbs,et al.  Field Verification of the Damage Index Method in a Concrete Box‐Girder Bridge via Visual Inspection , 2001 .

[23]  S. S. Law,et al.  DAMAGE LOCALIZATION BY DIRECTLY USING INCOMPLETE MODE SHAPES. TECHNICAL NOTE , 2000 .

[24]  Robert D. Adams,et al.  The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies , 1979 .

[25]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[26]  Antonio Ruiz,et al.  Performance assessment of multicriteria damage identification genetic algorithms , 2009 .

[27]  Keith Hjelmstad,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DETECTION AND ASSESSMENT FROM MODAL RESPONSE , 2003 .