Multi-model analysis of tree competition along environmental gradients in southern New England forests.

Robust predictions of competitive interactions among canopy trees and variation in tree growth along environmental gradients represent key challenges for the management of mixed-species, uneven-aged forests. We analyzed the effects of competition on tree growth along environmental gradients for eight of the most common tree species in southern New England and southeastern New York using forest inventory and analysis (FIA) data, information theoretic decision criteria, and multi-model inference to evaluate models. The suite of models estimated growth of individual trees as a species-specific function of average potential diameter growth, tree diameter at breast height, local environmental conditions, and crowding by neighboring trees. We used ordination based on the relative basal area of species to generate a measure of site conditions in each plot. Two ordination axes were consistent with variation in species abundance along moisture and fertility gradients. Estimated potential growth varied along at least one of these axes for six of the eight species; peak relative abundance of less shade-tolerant species was in all cases displaced away from sites where they showed maximum potential growth. Our crowding functions estimate the strength of competitive effects of neighbors; only one species showed support for the hypothesis that all species of competitors have equivalent effects on growth. The relative weight of evidence (Akaike weights) for the best models varied from a low of 0.207 for Fraxinus americana to 0.747 for Quercus rubra. In such cases, model averaging provides a more robust platform for prediction than that based solely on the best model. We show that predictions based on the selected best models dramatically overestimated differences between species relative to predictions based on the averaged set of models.

[1]  Jerald B. Johnson,et al.  Model selection in ecology and evolution. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  B. McCune,et al.  Analysis of Ecological Communities , 2002 .

[3]  D. Greene,et al.  An evaluation of alternative dispersal functions for trees , 2004 .

[4]  C. Canham,et al.  Effects of suppression and release on sapling growth for 11 tree species of northern, interior British Columbia , 2000 .

[5]  J. Kruskal Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .

[6]  M. Wimberly,et al.  Distance-dependent and distance-independent models of Douglas-fir and western hemlock basal area growth following silvicultural treatment , 1996 .

[7]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  A Primer of Ecological Statistics , 2004 .

[8]  Kelsey S. Milner,et al.  FVSBGC: a hybrid of the physiological model STAND-BGC and the forest vegetation simulator , 2003 .

[9]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Creating a forestry for the 21st century : the science of ecosystem management , 1997 .

[10]  M. Hill,et al.  Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique , 1980 .

[11]  Changhui Peng,et al.  TRIPLEX: a generic hybrid model for predicting forest growth and carbon and nitrogen dynamics , 2002 .

[12]  J. Kruskal Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis , 1964 .

[13]  Michael J. Papaik,et al.  Neighborhood analyses of canopy tree competition along environmental gradients in New England forests. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  John A. Silander,et al.  Juvenile Tree Survivorship as a Component of Shade Tolerance , 1995 .

[15]  T. Jones,et al.  The time course of diameter increment responses to selection harvests in Acer saccharum , 2004 .

[16]  William L. Goffe,et al.  SIMANN: FORTRAN module to perform Global Optimization of Statistical Functions with Simulated Annealing , 1992 .

[17]  John A. Silander,et al.  Sapling growth as a function of resources in a north temperate forest , 1994 .

[18]  C. Canham,et al.  A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition : effects of shading versus crowding , 2004 .

[19]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  H. Fowells Silvics of forest trees of the United States. , 1965 .

[21]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[22]  R. Kobe,et al.  Intraspecific Variation in Sapling Mortality and Growth Predicts Geographic Variation in Forest Composition , 1996 .

[23]  Rupert Seidl,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy and generality of a hybrid patch model. , 2005, Tree physiology.

[24]  Paul M. Mather Computational Methods of Multivariate Analysis in Physical Geography , 1976 .

[25]  S. Hubbell,et al.  A spatially explicit model of sapling growth in a tropical forest: does the identity of neighbours matter? , 2004 .

[26]  C. Canham,et al.  Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: effects of soil elemental composition and texture on species distributions , 1997 .

[27]  Christian Messier,et al.  Use of a spatially explicit individual-tree model (SORTIE/BC) to explore the implications of patchiness in structurally complex forests , 2003 .

[28]  Christian Messier,et al.  Predictions of understorey light conditions in northern hardwood forests following parameterization, sensitivity analysis, and tests of the SORTIE light model , 2002 .

[29]  C. Canham,et al.  Invasion of an old-growth forest in New York by Ailanthus altissima: sapling growth and recruitment in canopy gaps. , 2000 .

[30]  R. Hilborn,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1997 .

[31]  S. Stafford,et al.  Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research , 2000, Springer New York.

[32]  A. Ek,et al.  Description and validation of a hybrid model of forest growth and stand dynamics for the Great Lakes region , 2003 .

[33]  James B. Grace,et al.  Components of resource competition in plant communities. , 1990 .

[34]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  A NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS OF TREE GROWTH AND SURVIVAL IN A HURRICANE‐DRIVEN TROPICAL FOREST , 2004 .

[35]  E. Prepas,et al.  The current state of boreal forestry and the drive for change. , 2003 .

[36]  M. Battaglia,et al.  Using hybrid models to develop silvicultural prescriptions for Eucalyptus nitens , 2001 .

[37]  S. Pacala,et al.  SEEDLING RECRUITMENT IN FORESTS: CALIBRATING MODELS TO PREDICT PATTERNS OF TREE SEEDLING DISPERSION' , 1994 .

[38]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[39]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  Seed Dispersal Near and Far: Patterns Across Temperate and Tropical Forests , 1999 .

[40]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests : interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees , 1994 .

[41]  James P. Kimmins,et al.  Sustainable development in Canadian forestry in the face of changing paradigms , 1995 .

[42]  Jan Lepš,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data , 2006 .

[43]  R. Whittaker Communities and Ecosystems , 1975 .