Does Left Atrial Appendage Closure Reduce Mortality? A Vital Status Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT AF and PREVAIL Clinical Trials.

Compared with warfarin, left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) reduced mortality in an analysis of the PROTECTAF and PREVAIL trials. However, these data were limited by patient drop-out.We sought to estimatethe mortality benefit with LAACusing updated vital status information.In PROTECT AF and PREVAIL, 227 of 1114 randomized subjects failed to complete 5-year follow-up. Centers were manually queried for updated vital status on 76 subjects (33%).During median follow-up 5.0 years (interquartile range 3.8, 5.1), 112 of 732 LAAC subjects (15.3%) and 79 of 382 controls (20.7%) died. The hazard ratio for all-cause mortality with LAAC compared with warfarin was 0.70 (95% CI 0.53-0.94, p=0.017).Subgroup analyses suggested that subjects <75 years and those with higher CHA2DS2-VASc score, history of transient ischemic attack or stroke, and permanent AF derived particular benefit, although interaction terms were not significant.The number needed to treat(NNT) with LAAC to prevent one death over 5 years was 16 (95% CI 10-82). Despite competing mortality risks in this elderly cohort, updated vital status data from PROTECT AF and PREVAIL revealed that LAAC was associated with 30% improved survival compared with warfarin, with an NNT of 16.

[1]  Saibal Kar,et al.  5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Marc P. Bonaca,et al.  Antiplatelet Therapy for Long-term Secondary Prevention After Myocardial Infarction. , 2016, JAMA cardiology.

[3]  Saibal Kar,et al.  Left Atrial Appendage Closure as an Alternative to Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Mack,et al.  5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[5]  Saibal Kar,et al.  Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure vs warfarin for atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. , 2014, JAMA.

[6]  J. Douketis,et al.  Comparing mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation who are receiving a direct‐acting oral anticoagulant or warfarin: a meta‐analysis of randomized trials , 2014, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[7]  M. Price,et al.  Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Alexander Parkhomenko,et al.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials , 2014, The Lancet.

[9]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Statin therapy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. , 2013, JAMA.

[10]  M. O'Neill,et al.  Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in heart failure. , 2013, Heart failure clinics.

[11]  S. Sacco,et al.  Incidence and 10-Year Survival of Intracerebral Hemorrhage in a Population-Based Registry , 2009, Stroke.

[12]  M. Aguilar,et al.  Meta-analysis: Antithrombotic Therapy to Prevent Stroke in Patients Who Have Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  J. Daubert,et al.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  M C Oz,et al.  Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  D G Altman,et al.  Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an event , 1999, BMJ.