Implant primary stability with an osteocondensation drilling protocol in different density polyurethane blocks

Abstract The implant primary stability is a fundamental condition for avoiding implant micro-motions that might result in fibrous encapsulation; its achievement is facilitated by macro- and micro-geometry of the implant, and by the bone density and architecture at the intended implant site. The aim was to evaluate an osteocondensing drilling protocol for dental implant positioning compared to standard protocol on polyurethane block. A total of 40 implants, 20 for each osteocondensing group (Test) and 20 for standard drilling group (Control), were positioned. Insertion torque (IT), removal torque (RT), and Periotest were measured. A IT, RT, and Periotest significant difference was present in favor of the implant osteocondensing protocol. The results suggested that osteocondensing protocol represents a useful technique for implant placement in poor density bone.

[1]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Osseodensification Drilling vs. Standard Protocol of Implant Site Preparation: An In Vitro Study on Polyurethane Foam Sheets , 2020, Prosthesis.

[2]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Primary Stability of Dental Implants in Low-Density (10 and 20 pcf) Polyurethane Foam Blocks: Conical vs Cylindrical Implants , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  A. Piattelli,et al.  A Narrative Review of the Histological and Histomorphometrical Evaluation of the Peri-Implant Bone in Loaded and Unloaded Dental Implants. A 30-Year Experience (1988–2018) , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[4]  A. Scarano,et al.  Infrared Thermographic Evaluation of Temperature Modifications Induced during Implant Site Preparation with Steel vs. Zirconia Implant Drill , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[5]  Luca Comuzzi,et al.  Short vs. Standard Length Cone Morse Connection Implants: An In Vitro Pilot Study in Low Density Polyurethane Foam , 2019, Symmetry.

[6]  M. Del Fabbro,et al.  Synthetic Blocks for Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[7]  I. Khouly,et al.  Horizontal ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration using particulate xenogenic bone substitutes with or without autogenous block grafts: A randomized controlled trial. , 2019, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[8]  A. Piattelli,et al.  An In Vitro Evaluation, on Polyurethane Foam Sheets, of the Insertion Torque (IT) Values, Pull-Out Torque Values, and Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) of NanoShort Dental Implants , 2019, Polymers.

[9]  Margherita Tumedei,et al.  Histological and Histomorphometric Analyses of Two Bovine Bone Blocks Implanted in Rabbit Calvaria , 2019, Symmetry.

[10]  F. Carinci,et al.  Ultrasonic vs Drill Implant Site Preparation: Post-Operative Pain Measurement Through VAS, Swelling and Crestal Bone Remodeling: A Randomized Clinical Study , 2018, Materials.

[11]  R. Neiva,et al.  A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Study with Up-to-5-Year Follow-up Utilizing a Method that Enhances Bone Density and Allows for Transcrestal Sinus Augmentation Through Compaction Grafting. , 2018, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  M. Essa,et al.  PAX3: A Molecule with Oncogenic or Tumor Suppressor Function Is Involved in Cancer , 2018, BioMed Research International.

[13]  P. Trisi,et al.  Correlation Between Implant Geometry, Implant Surface, Insertion Torque, and Primary Stability: In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis. , 2018, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  A. Scarano,et al.  Influence of the Thermal Treatment to Address a Better Osseointegration of Ti6Al4V Dental Implants: Histological and Histomorphometrical Study in a Rabbit Model , 2018, BioMed research international.

[15]  L. Lamazza,et al.  The effects of surgical preparation techniques and implant macro-geometry on primary stability: An in vitro study , 2017, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[16]  I. Bajsić,et al.  Effects of a drill diameter on the temperature rise in a bone during implant site preparation under clinical conditions , 2016, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[17]  Paolo Trisi,et al.  New Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Method to Increase Bone Density in Low-Density Bone: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep , 2016, Implant dentistry.

[18]  F. Hölzle,et al.  Compensating for poor primary implant stability in different bone densities by varying implant geometry: a laboratory study. , 2015, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[19]  A. Cataldi,et al.  Morphological Aspect and iNOS and Bax Expression Modification in Bone Tissue Around Dental Implants Positioned Using Piezoelectric Bone Surgery Versus Conventional Drill Technique , 2015, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[20]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Primary stability determination by means of insertion torque and RFA in a sample of 4,135 implants. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[21]  F. Carinci,et al.  Vertical ridge augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible using an inlay technique with a xenograft without miniscrews and miniplates: case series. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[22]  Fawad Javed,et al.  The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[23]  R. Moreira,et al.  Influence of diameter and length of implant on early dental implant failure. , 2010, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[24]  D. E. Slot,et al.  Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. , 2009, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[25]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue-stabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[26]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Correlation between implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact: a retrospective histological and histomorphometrical study of seven titanium implants retrieved from humans. , 2006, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[27]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Bone response to submerged, unloaded implants inserted in poor bone sites: a histological and histomorphometrical study of 8 titanium implants retrieved from man. , 2005, The Journal of oral implantology.

[28]  T. Testori,et al.  Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. , 2004, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[29]  A Scarano,et al.  Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[30]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Rigid fixation by means of titanium mesh in edentulous ridge expansion for horizontal ridge augmentation in the maxilla. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[31]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Osseointegration: current state of the art. , 1989, Dental clinics of North America.

[32]  E. Meyer,et al.  A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact. , 2017, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[33]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications. , 2014, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[34]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Histologic studies on osseointegration: soft tissues response to implant surfaces and components. A review. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[35]  Samer Al-Jetaily,et al.  Assessment of Osstell™ and Periotest® systems in measuring dental implant stability (in vitro study). , 2011, The Saudi dental journal.