Selection of elastomeric materials for compliant-layered total hip arthroplasty

Abstract A selection procedure has been developed to identify suitable commercial materials for use in compliant-layer artificial hip joints. Mechanical requirements, notably hardness and strength, as well as biocompatibility, constituted the specification for the compliant layer. Applying these constraints, candidate materials were identified in a broad range of polymeric material classes. Detailed sourcing and literature searching helped to identify materials appropriate to the application, with suitable mechanical and physical properties, as well as a history of successful clinical use. Some likely materials were identified but were prohibited from further consideration by limited commercial availability. Physical and mechanical characterization together with literature data were used to determine the relative ranking of the candidate materials and through a weighted materials property selection procedure the materials of choice were identified. The linear segmented aromatic polyurethanes, Tecothane 1085 and Estane 5714F1, emerged as the preferred materials.

[1]  B. Tighe,et al.  Towards a synthetic articular cartilage. , 1993, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[2]  D Dowson,et al.  Some new evidence on human joint lubrication. , 1975, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  A. Unsworth The effects of lubrication in hip joint prostheses. , 1978, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  M Szycher,et al.  Biostability of Polyurethane Elastomers: A Critical Review , 1988, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[5]  P. Cahalan,et al.  Factors and Interactions Affecting the Performance of Polyurethane Elastomers in Medical Devices , 1988, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[6]  J E Smeathers,et al.  New Engineering Concepts and Alternative Materials for Prostheses , 1990, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[7]  J Fisher,et al.  Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Wear Debris Generated in Vivo and in Laboratory Tests; the Influence of Counterface Roughness , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  M. Semlitsch,et al.  Reactions of the articular capsule to wear products of artificial joint prostheses. , 1977, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  T. L. Smith Strength of elastorners—a perspective , 1977 .

[10]  D. Dowson,et al.  The causes of femoral head roughening in explanted Charnley hip prostheses. , 1987, Engineering in medicine.

[11]  D. Lyman,et al.  Polyurethane Elastomers in Surgery , 1977 .

[12]  A. Unsworth,et al.  Soft layer lubrication of artificial hip joints , 1988 .

[13]  Arthur J. Coury,et al.  Medical applications of implantable polyurethanes: current issues , 1987 .

[14]  T. L. Smith,et al.  Strength of Elastomers. A Perspective , 1978 .

[15]  J Fisher,et al.  The Influence of Loading Time and Lubricant on the Friction of Articular Cartilage , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[16]  C. Wu,et al.  Properties of Segmented Poly(urethaneureas) Based on 2,4-Toluene Diisocyanate. 1. Thermal Transitions, X-ray Studies, and Comparison with Segmented Poly(urethanes) , 1980 .

[17]  D. Dowson,et al.  Start up and steady state friction of thin polyurethane layers , 1993 .

[18]  E. B. Mathiesen,et al.  Tissue reactions to wear products from polyacetal (Delrin) and UHMW polyethylene in total hip replacement. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[19]  S. Gogolewski Selected topics in biomedical polyurethanes. A review , 1989 .