What is the probability that direct detection experiments have observed dark matter?

In Dark Matter direct detection we are facing the situation of some experiments reporting positive signals which are in conflict with limits from other experiments. Such conclusions are subject to large uncertainties introduced by the poorly known local Dark Matter distribution. We present a method to calculate an upper bound on the joint probability of obtaining the outcome of two potentially conflicting experiments under the assumption that the Dark Matter hypothesis is correct, but completely independent of assumptions about the Dark Matter distribution. In this way we can quantify the compatibility of two experiments in an astrophysics independent way. We illustrate our method by testing the compatibility of the hints reported by DAMA and CDMS-Si with the limits from the LUX and SuperCDMS experiments. The method does not require Monte Carlo simulations but is mostly based on using Poisson statistics. In order to deal with signals of few events we introduce the so-called "signal length" to take into account energy information. The signal length method provides a simple way to calculate the probability to obtain a given experimental outcome under a specified Dark Matter and background hypothesis.

[1]  P. Fox,et al.  Integrating out astrophysical uncertainties , 2010, 1011.1915.

[2]  G. Kribs,et al.  Interpreting dark matter direct detection independently of the local velocity and density distribution , 2010, 1011.1910.

[3]  I. Shoemaker,et al.  Halo-independent direct detection of momentum-dependent dark matter , 2014, 1405.1420.

[4]  P. Gondolo,et al.  Generalized halo independent comparison of direct dark matter detection data , 2013, 1306.5273.

[5]  P. Belli,et al.  New results from DAMA/LIBRA , 2010, 1002.1028.

[6]  F. Kahlhoefer,et al.  The Unbearable Lightness of Being: CDMS versus XENON , 2013, 1304.6066.

[7]  H. S. Miley,et al.  CoGeNT: A Search for Low-Mass Dark Matter using p-type Point Contact Germanium Detectors , 2012, 1208.5737.

[8]  R. W. Ogburn,et al.  Limits on spin-independent interactions of weakly interacting massive particles with nucleons from the two-tower run of the cryogenic dark matter search. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[9]  D. Hauff,et al.  Results on low mass WIMPs using an upgraded CRESST-II detector , 2014, 1407.3146.

[10]  J. Fast,et al.  Search for An Annual Modulation in Three Years of CoGeNT Dark Matter Detector Data , 2014, 1401.3295.

[11]  R. Catena,et al.  Anisotropic dark matter distribution functions and impact on WIMP direct detection , 2013, 1310.0468.

[12]  C. McCabe DAMA and CoGeNT without astrophysical uncertainties , 2011, 1107.0741.

[13]  D. Hauff,et al.  Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II Dark Matter search , 2011, 1109.0702.

[14]  Jonathan H. Davis,et al.  Quantifying the evidence for dark matter in CoGeNT data , 2014, 1405.0495.

[15]  M. Miller,et al.  Search for an annual modulation in a p-type Point Contact germanium dark matter detector. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[16]  J. Zupan,et al.  Astrophysics-independent bounds on the annual modulation of dark matter signals. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[17]  V. Cirigliano,et al.  Shining LUX on isospin-violating dark matter beyond leading order , 2013, 1311.5886.

[18]  P. Fox,et al.  Taking Halo-independent dark matter methods out of the bin , 2014, 1403.6830.

[19]  Jonathan L. Feng,et al.  Isospin-violating dark matter , 2011, 1102.4331.

[20]  J. Zupan,et al.  Halo-independent methods for inelastic dark matter scattering , 2013, 1305.3575.

[21]  Jan Conrad,et al.  Statistical Issues in Astrophysical Searches for Particle Dark Matter , 2014, 1407.6617.

[22]  K. McCarthy Dark Matter Search Results from the Silicon Detectors of the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search Experiment , 2013 .

[23]  C. Winant,et al.  Erratum: Search for light dark matter in XENON10 data (Physical Review Letters (2011) 107 (051301)) , 2013 .

[24]  H. R. Harris,et al.  Search for Low-Mass WIMPs with SuperCDMS , 2014, 1402.7137.

[25]  D O Caldwell,et al.  Results from a low-energy analysis of the CDMS II germanium data. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[26]  C. Winant,et al.  Search for light dark matter in XENON10 data. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[27]  P. Gondolo,et al.  Update on light WIMP limits: LUX, lite and light , 2013, 1311.4247.

[28]  J. Zupan,et al.  Dark matter attempts for CoGeNT and DAMA , 2011, 1106.6241.

[29]  Univ. Jing Gangshan,et al.  Final model independent result of DAMA/LIBRA–phase1 , 2013, 1308.5109.

[30]  D O Caldwell,et al.  Silicon detector dark matter results from the final exposure of CDMS II. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[31]  M. Miller,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Signal Extraction Method Applied to 3.4 years of CoGeNT Data , 2014, 1401.6234.

[32]  F. Kahlhoefer,et al.  A new halo-independent approach to dark matter direct detection analysis , 2014, 1403.4606.

[33]  F. Kahlhoefer,et al.  Quantifying (dis)agreement between direct detection experiments in a halo-independent way , 2014, 1409.5446.

[34]  I. Dur'an,et al.  Observational constraints on a holographic, interacting dark energy model , 2010, 1007.0390.

[35]  Goodman,et al.  Detectability of certain dark-matter candidates. , 1985, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[36]  J. Zupan,et al.  On the annual modulation signal in dark matter direct detection , 2011, 1112.1627.

[37]  V. Cirigliano,et al.  WIMP-nucleus scattering in chiral effective theory , 2012, 1205.2695.

[38]  F. Kahlhoefer,et al.  Resolving astrophysical uncertainties in dark matter direct detection , 2011, 1111.0292.

[39]  A. Pierce,et al.  CoGeNT Interpretations , 2010, 1004.0697.

[40]  G. Drake,et al.  Results from a search for light-mass dark matter with a p-type point contact germanium detector. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[41]  R. Webb,et al.  First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford underground research facility. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[42]  J. S. Lee,et al.  Limits on interactions between weakly interacting massive particles and nucleons obtained with NaI(Tl) crystal detectors , 2007, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[43]  P. Gondolo,et al.  Halo-independent analysis of direct detection data for light WIMPs , 2013, 1304.6183.

[44]  C. Kelso A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset , 2016 .

[45]  Mario Pillon,et al.  New limits on WIMP search with large-mass low-radioactivity NaI(Tl) set-up at Gran Sasso , 1996 .

[46]  E Aprile,et al.  Dark matter results from 225 live days of XENON100 data. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[47]  D O Caldwell,et al.  Dark Matter Search Results from the CDMS II Experiment , 2009, Science.

[48]  E. Nobile Halo-Independent Comparison of Direct Dark Matter Detection Data , 2013, 1404.4130.