Wastewater Treatment Plant Operation: Simple Control Schemes with a Holistic Perspective

In this paper, a control approach for improving the overall efficiency of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is presented. It consists of a cascaded control system that uses a global performance indicator as the controlled variable to drive the plant to operating conditions that satisfies trade-offs involved in the WWTP operation, improving the global performance of the plant. The selected global performance indicator is the N/E index that measures the ratio between the amount of nitrogenated compounds eliminated (kgN) and the energy (kWh) required to achieve that goal. This index links the variables of the activated sludge process with the energy consumed in the whole plant, thus the control strategy takes actions based on plantwide considerations. An external Proportional Integral (PI) controller changes the DO set point according to the N/E index and the basic dissolved oxygen (DO) control scheme in the activated sludge process follows this reference changes varying the aeration intensity. An outer loop with an event-based controller is used to compute the index values when the DO concentration is driven to excessively low limits, preventing long operation periods in this undesirable condition. Simple proportional integral controllers (PI) are used to adapt the strategy to the automation systems available in WWTPs. The implementation in the Benchmark Simulation Model 2 (BSM2) demonstrates the potential of the proposed approach. The results show the possibilities of the N/E index to be used as an indicator of global performance of WWTPs. It provides a link between water line objectives and energy consumption in the whole plant that can be exploited to introduce plantwide considerations in alternative control strategies formulated to drive the plant to operating conditions that optimize the overall process efficiency.

[1]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Balancing effluent quality, economic cost and greenhouse gas emissions during the evaluation of (plant-wide) control/operational strategies in WWTPs. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  Applying variable dissolved oxygen set point in a two level hierarchical control structure to a wastewater treatment process , 2015 .

[4]  Helena Alegre,et al.  A performance indicators system for urban wastewater treatment plants. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  L Åmand,et al.  Aeration control - a review. , 2013, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  Javier Lafuente,et al.  Cost and effluent quality controllers design based on the relative gain array for a nutrient removal WWTP. , 2009, Water research.

[7]  Silvana Revollar,et al.  Integration of set point optimization techniques into nonlinear MPC for improving the operation of WWTPs , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[8]  L. Corominas,et al.  Including greenhouse gas emissions during benchmarking of wastewater treatment plant control strategies. , 2011, Water research.

[9]  Barry Lennox,et al.  Model predictive control of an activated sludge process: A case study , 2011 .

[10]  Juan M. Lema,et al.  Operation of an innovative WWTP with environmental objectives. A model-based analysis , 2016 .

[11]  X. Gabarrell,et al.  Environmental assessment of an urban water system , 2013 .

[12]  Francesc Hernández-Sancho,et al.  A data analysis approach to evaluate the impact of the capacity utilization on the energy consumption of wastewater treatment plants , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[13]  Francesco Corona,et al.  An application of predictive control to the Viikinmäki wastewater treatment plant , 2013 .

[14]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  Fuzzy Control and Model Predictive Control Configurations for Effluent Violations Removal in Wastewater Treatment Plants , 2015 .

[15]  J. B. Copp,et al.  Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[16]  F Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Energy saving in WWTP: Daily benchmarking under uncertainty and data availability limitations. , 2016, Environmental research.

[17]  Juan M. Lema,et al.  Monitoring and diagnosis of energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants. A state of the art and proposals for improvement , 2016 .

[18]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Benchmark Simulation Model no. 1 (BSM1) , 2008 .

[19]  I. Takács A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process , 1991 .

[20]  N Hvala,et al.  Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: a simulation study. , 2007, Water research.

[21]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[22]  Gustaf Olsson,et al.  ICA and me--a subjective review. , 2012, Water research.

[23]  R. Vilanova,et al.  A hierachical Plant wide operation in wastewater treatment plants: overall efficiency index control and event-based reference management , 2018, 2018 22nd International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC).

[24]  J. Drewnowski Advanced Supervisory Control System Implemented at Full-Scale WWTP—A Case Study of Optimization and Energy Balance Improvement , 2019, Water.

[25]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment as an environmental evaluation tool for control strategies in wastewater treatment plants , 2015 .

[26]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Dynamic influent pollutant disturbance scenario generation using a phenomenological modelling approach , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[27]  Leiv Rieger,et al.  Improving Nutrient Removal While Reducing Energy Use at Three Swiss WWTPs Using Advanced Control , 2012, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[28]  P. Dold,et al.  Ammonia‐Based Feedforward and Feedback Aeration Control in Activated Sludge Processes , 2014, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[29]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Multicriteria performance analysis of an integrated urban wastewater system for energy management , 2017 .

[30]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  Optimal control of wastewater treatment plants using economic-oriented model predictive dynamic strategies , 2017 .

[31]  I. Takács,et al.  Elemental Balances in Activated Sludge Modelling , 2006 .

[32]  M. Morari,et al.  Internal model control: PID controller design , 1986 .

[33]  G T Gordon,et al.  Basis for the development of sustainable optimisation indicators for activated sludge wastewater treatment plants in the Republic of Ireland. , 2015, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[34]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  Applying Control Actions for Water Line and Sludge Line To Increase Wastewater Treatment Plant Performance , 2018 .

[35]  A. Hospido,et al.  Environmental and economic profile of six typologies of wastewater treatment plants. , 2011, Water research.

[36]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  Joint Environmental and Economical Analysis of Wastewater Treatment Plants Control Strategies: A Benchmark Scenario Analysis , 2016 .

[37]  Ignacio Santín,et al.  On the evaluation of the global impact of control strategies applied to wastewater treatment plants , 2017 .