On diversity reception over fading channels with impulsive noise

In this paper, we analyze the performance of different diversity combining techniques over fading channels with impulsive noise. We use Middleton's Class A model for the noise distribution and adopt two noise models, which assume dependent and independent noise components on each branch. We systematically analyze the performance of maximum ratio combing (MRC), equal gain combining (EGC), selection combining (SC), and post-detection combining (PDC) under these impulsive noise models, and derive insightful lower and upper bounds. We show that even under impulsive noise, the diversity order is retained for each combining scheme. However, we also show that under both models, there is a fundamental tradeoff between diversity gain and coding gain. Under the independent noise model, PDC is shown to combat impulsive noise more effectively than MRC, EGC, and SC. Our simulation results also corroborate our analysis.

[1]  Marco Lops,et al.  Optimum detection of fading signals in impulsive noise , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[2]  Bruno O. Shubert,et al.  Random variables and stochastic processes , 1979 .

[3]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[4]  S.A. Kassam,et al.  Robust techniques for signal processing: A survey , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  Marco Lops,et al.  Optimum detection over Rayleigh-fading, dispersive channels, with non-Gaussian noise , 1997, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[6]  P. A. Delaney,et al.  Signal detection in multivariate class-A interference , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  David Middleton,et al.  Non-Gaussian Noise Models in Signal Processing for Telecommunications: New Methods and Results for Class A and Class B Noise Models , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  Vijay K. Bhargava,et al.  Equal-gain diversity receiver performance in wireless channels , 2000, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[9]  Shu Hung Leung,et al.  On the performance of DPSK in Rician fading channels with Class A noise , 2000, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[10]  A. J. Han Vinck,et al.  Performance bounds for optimum and suboptimum reception under Class-A impulsive noise , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  Cihan Tepedelenlioglu,et al.  Performance of diversity reception over fading channels with impulsive noise , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[12]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Communications , 1983 .

[13]  D. Middleton,et al.  Optimum Reception in an Impulsive Interference Environment - Part II: Incoherent Reception , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[14]  A. J. Han Vinck,et al.  Iterative decoding of codes over complex numbers for impulsive noise channels , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  Ramjee Prasad,et al.  Performance of microcellular mobile radio in a cochannel interference, natural, and man-made noise environment , 1993 .

[16]  A. Spaulding,et al.  Optimum Reception in an Impulsive Interference Environment - Part I: Coherent Detection , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[17]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Digital Communication Over Fading Channels: A Unified Approach to Performance Analysis , 2000 .

[18]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  An adaptive spatial diversity receiver for non-Gaussian interference and noise , 1997 .

[19]  Okechukwu C. Ugweje,et al.  Selection diversity for wireless communications in Nakagami-fading with arbitrary parameters , 2001, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..