Safety in numbers? Investigating Australian driver behaviour, knowledge and attitudes towards cyclists.

A key tenet of the safety in numbers theory is that as the number of people cycling increases, more drivers will also be cyclists and therefore will give greater consideration to cyclists when driving. We tested this theory in relation to self-reported behaviour, attitudes and knowledge in relation to cycling. An online survey was conducted of Australian drivers (n=1984) who were also cyclists (cyclist-drivers) and drivers who did not cycle (drivers). Cyclist-drivers were 1.5 times more likely than drivers to report safe driving behaviours related to sharing the roads with cyclists (95% CI: 1.1-1.9, p<0.01). Cyclist-drivers had better knowledge of the road rules related to cycling infrastructure than drivers; however knowledge of road rules related to bike lanes was low for both groups. Drivers were more likely than cyclist-drivers to have negative attitudes (e.g. cyclists are unpredictable and repeatedly overtaking cyclists is frustrating). Findings from this study highlight the need for increased education and awareness in relation to safe driving behaviour, road rules and attitudes towards cyclists. Specific recommendations are made for approaches to improve safety for cyclists.

[1]  Rune Elvik,et al.  The non-linearity of risk and the promotion of environmentally sustainable transport. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Ian Walker,et al.  Drivers overtaking bicyclists: objective data on the effects of riding position, helmet use, vehicle type and apparent gender. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Stuart Newstead,et al.  Naturalistic cycling study: identifying risk factors for on-road commuter cyclists. , 2010, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[4]  B. Rowe,et al.  Bicyclist and environmental factors associated with fatal bicycle-related trauma in Ontario. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[5]  Michael A. Tarrant,et al.  Digit preference, recall bias, and nonresponse bias in self reports of angling participation , 1993 .

[6]  D. Uzzell,et al.  Affective Appraisals of the Daily Commute , 2007 .

[7]  Ward Vanlaar,et al.  Aggressive driving: a survey of attitudes, opinions and behaviors. , 2008, Journal of safety research.

[8]  L Aultman-Hall,et al.  Ottawa-Carleton commuter cyclist on- and off-road incident rates. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Hugh McClintock,et al.  Cycle facilities and cyclists' safety : Experience from Greater Nottingham and lessons for future cycling provision , 1996 .

[10]  Nathan McNeil,et al.  Multiuser Perspectives on Separated, On-Street Bicycle Infrastructure , 2012 .

[11]  S. Coughlin.  Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  M McCarthy,et al.  Cyclist road deaths in London 1985-1992: drivers, vehicles, manoeuvres and injuries. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  J. Pucher,et al.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[14]  Mai-Britt Herslund,et al.  Looked-but-failed-to-see-errors in traffic. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes in Driver Behavior at Roundabouts and Crossroads , 2000 .

[16]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany , 2008 .

[17]  C. Munro.  Australian cycling participation 2011 , 2011 .

[18]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Evaluation of bike boxes at signalized intersections. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Alessandra Marinoni,et al.  Are car drivers holding a motorcycle licence less responsible for motorcycle--car crash occurrence? A non-parametric approach. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Marilyn Johnson,et al.  Naturalistic cycling study: identifying risk factors for cyclists in the Australian Capital Territory , 2014 .

[21]  H Summala,et al.  Bicycle accidents and drivers' visual search at left and right turns. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Mary Sissons Joshi,et al.  A diary study of the risk perceptions of road users , 2001 .

[23]  Malcolm Daff,et al.  Marking Melbourne’s Arterial Roads to Assist Cyclists , 2005 .

[24]  Birgitta Gatersleben,et al.  Contemplating Cycling to Work: Attitudes and Perceptions in Different Stages of Change , 2007 .

[25]  S Bygrave,et al.  Behaviour at cycle advanced stop lines , 2005 .

[26]  Chris Rissel,et al.  Driver Road Rule Knowledge and Attitudes towards Cyclists , 2002 .

[27]  Stuart Vaughan Newstead,et al.  Painting a Designated Space: Cyclist and Driver Compliance at Cycling Infrastructure at Intersections , 2010 .

[28]  S L Warner,et al.  Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. , 1965, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[29]  W W Hunter.  EVALUATION OF A COMBINED BICYCLE LANE/RIGHT TURN LANE IN EUGENE, OREGON , 2000 .

[30]  G. L. Johnson,et al.  AGGRESSIVE DRIVING BEHAVIORS: ARE THERE PSYCHOLOGICAL AND ATTITUDINAL PREDICTORS? , 2003 .

[31]  David Crundall,et al.  Car drivers' attitudes towards motorcyclists: a survey. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.