Abundance, spatial variance and occupancy: arthropod species distribution in the Azores.

1. The positive abundance-occupancy and abundance-variance relationships are two of the most widely documented patterns in population and community ecology. 2. Recently, a general model has been proposed linking the mean abundance, the spatial variance in abundance, and the occupancy of species. A striking feature of this model is that it consists explicitly of the three variables abundance, variance and occupancy, and no extra parameters are involved. However, little is known about how well the model performs. 3. Here, we show that the abundance-variance-occupancy model fits extremely well to data on the abundance, variance and occupancy of a large number of arthropod species in natural forest patches in the Azores, at three spatial extents, and distinguishing between species of different colonization status. Indeed, virtually all variation about the bivariate abundance-occupancy and abundance-variance relationships is effectively explained by the third missing variable (variance in abundance in the case of the abundance-occupancy relationship, and occupancy in the case of the abundance-variance relationship). 4. Introduced species tend to exhibit lower densities, less spatial variance in these densities, and occupy fewer sites than native and endemic species. None the less, they all lie on the same bivariate abundance-occupancy and abundance-variance, and trivariate abundance-variance-occupancy, relationships. 5. Density, spatial variance in density, and occupancy appear to be all the things one needs to know to describe much of the spatial distribution of species.

[1]  D. Kramer,et al.  Taylor's power law as a consequence of Fretwell's ideal free distribution , 1986 .

[2]  Kevin J Gaston,et al.  Estimating Species Abundance from Occurrence , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[3]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[4]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Two General Metapopulation Models and the Core-Satellite Species Hypothesis , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[5]  B. Ekbom.  Incidence Counts for Estimating Densities of Rhopalosiphum padi (Homoptera: Aphididae) , 1987 .

[6]  L. Taylor,et al.  Variance and the large scale spatial stability of aphids, moths and birds. , 1980 .

[7]  Ian P. Woiwod,et al.  Density-dependence of spatial behavior and rarity of randomness , 1978 .

[8]  '. L.T.WILSON.  Clumping Patterns of Fruit and Arthropods in Cotton , with Implications for Binomial Sampling ' , 2002 .

[9]  J. Wunderlich,et al.  Ranking protected areas in the Azores using standardised sampling of soil epigean arthropods , 2005, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[10]  G. Hepworth,et al.  Systematic Presence-Absence Sampling Method Applied to Twospotted Spider Mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) on Strawberries in Victoria, Australia , 1992 .

[11]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Uniting Two General Patterns in the Distribution of Species , 1997, Science.

[12]  I. Oliver,et al.  Invertebrate Morphospecies as Surrogates for Species: A Case Study , 1996 .

[13]  L. Taylor.  Assessing and Interpreting the Spatial Distributions of Insect Populations , 1984 .

[14]  R. Nowierski,et al.  Populations of Sitobion avenae and Aphidius ervi on spring wheat in the northwestern United States Spatial distribution and sequential sampling plans based on numerical and binomial counts , 1993 .

[15]  G. Bell.  Neutral macroecology. , 2001, Science.

[16]  Thomas P. Ryan,et al.  Modern Regression Methods , 1996 .

[17]  Eizi Kuno,et al.  Sampling and Analysis of Insect Populations , 1991 .

[18]  Kevin J Gaston,et al.  Occupancy, Spatial Variance, and the Abundance of Species , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[19]  L. R. Taylor,et al.  Aggregation, Variance and the Mean , 1961, Nature.

[20]  K. Gaston,et al.  Interspecific abundance–occupancy relationships of British mammals and birds: is it possible to explain the residual variation? , 2003 .

[21]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  On the Relationship between Range Size and Local Abundance: Back to Basics , 1997 .

[22]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Abundance–occupancy relationships , 2000 .

[23]  R. May,et al.  Core and satellite species: theory and artefacts , 1991 .

[24]  B. A. Maurer.  Geographical Population Analysis: Tools for the Analysis of Biodiversity , 1994 .

[25]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Species diversity in ecological communities: edited by Robert E. Ricklefs and Dolph Schluter University of Chicago Press, 1993. $105.00 hbk, $35.00 pbk (414 pages) ISBN 0 226 71822 0/0 226 71823 9 , 1994 .

[26]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis , 1982 .

[27]  R. Routledge,et al.  Taylor's power law re-examined , 1991 .

[28]  K. Gaston,et al.  Abundance‐range size relationships in British birds: is unexplained variation a product of life history? , 1997 .

[29]  J. Bown,et al.  Towards a general theory of biodiversity , 2001, Nature.

[30]  J. Levine,et al.  Biological Invasions , 2004 .

[31]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Species‐Area Curves, Diversity Indices, and Species Abundance Distributions: A Multifractal Analysis , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[32]  B. McGill,et al.  A unified theory for macroecology based on spatial patterns of abundance , 2003 .

[33]  J. N. Perry,et al.  Taylor's Power Law for Dependence of Variance on Mean in Animal Populations , 1981 .

[34]  Eduardo Brito de Azevedo,et al.  Invasibility and species richness of island endemic arthropods: a general model of endemic vs. exotic species , 2006 .

[35]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Percolation theory for the distribution and abundance of species. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[36]  G. Bell,et al.  The interpretation of biological surveys , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Franklin A. Graybill,et al.  Theory and Application of the Linear Model , 1976 .

[38]  W. Sussex.  The use of incidence counts for estimation of cereal aphid populations. 3. Population development and the incidence­ density relation , 1986 .

[39]  M. Binns.  Behavioural dynamics and the negative binomial distribution , 1986 .

[40]  K. Gaston.  Implications of interspecific and intraspecific abundance-occupancy relationships , 1999 .

[41]  K. Yamamura.  Colony expansion model for describing the spatial distribution of populations , 2000, Population Ecology.

[42]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  SPECIES DIVERSITY PATTERNS DERIVED FROM SPECIES–AREA MODELS , 2002 .

[43]  Jessica Green,et al.  ENDEMICS–AREA RELATIONSHIPS: THE INFLUENCE OF SPECIES DOMINANCE AND SPATIAL AGGREGATION , 2003 .

[44]  J. Perry.  Some models for spatial variability of animal species. , 1988 .

[45]  S. Ribeiro,et al.  Canopy insect herbivores in the Azorean Laurisilva forests: key host plant species in a highly generalist insect community , 2005 .

[46]  J. Harte,et al.  Self‐Similarity and the Relationship between Abundance and Range Size , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[47]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Single‐species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations , 1991 .

[48]  K. Gaston,et al.  The temporal variability of densities : back to basics , 1995 .

[49]  E. Kuno.  Evaluation of statistical precision and design of efficient sampling for the population estimation based on frequency of occurrence , 1986, Researches on Population Ecology.

[50]  J. Emlen,et al.  ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES , 2008 .

[51]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Single-species metapopulation dynamics: A structured model , 1992 .

[52]  J. Perry.  Host-Parasitoid Models of Intermediate Complexity , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[53]  L. Taylor,et al.  THE NEGATIVE BINOMIAL AS A DYNAMIC ECOLOGICAL MODEL FOR AGGREGATION, AND THE DENSITY DEPENDENCE OF k , 1979 .

[54]  G. Nachman.  ESTIMATES OF MEAN POPULATION DENSITY AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF TETRANYCHUS URTICAE (ACARINA: TETRANYCHIDAE) AND PHYTOSEIULUS PERSIMILIS (ACARINA: PHYTOSEIIDAE) BASED UPON THE PROPORTION OF EMPTY SAMPLING UNITS , 1984 .

[55]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Using presence–absence data to establish reserve selection procedures that are robust to temporal species turnover , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  G. Nachman,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENSITY AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF A POPULATION , 1981 .

[57]  K. Gaston,et al.  Occupancy-abundance relationships and spatial distribution: A review , 2002 .

[58]  M. Hassell,et al.  Variability in the abundance of animal and plant species , 1982, Nature.

[59]  K. Gaston.  The multiple forms of the interspecific abundance : distribution relationship , 1996 .

[60]  Joshua B. Plotkin,et al.  SAMPLING THE SPECIES COMPOSITION OF A LANDSCAPE , 2002 .

[61]  I. Hanski.  Reply to Nee, Gregory and May , 1991 .

[62]  J. Lawton,et al.  Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: An appraisal of mechanisms , 1997 .

[63]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Modelling occurrence and abundance of species when detection is imperfect , 2005 .