Advisor-Advisee Relationship Mining Based on Co-author Network

Advisor-advisee relationship among scholars is important in the academia circle. It contains abundant information about the academic inheritance, advisor recommendation and the forming of research communities, etc. The advisor-advisee relationship is always hiding behind the co-author network, however, there are some challenges when mining this kind of relationship. This relationship is always changing with time, the size of labeled data is limited and the authors’ name ambiguity, etc. Previous works are focused on various aspects, including the citation network, the publication network and the co-author network, etc. To our best knowledge, all of these works are focused on the whole network, and none of them considered the credit allocation of the authors in each paper. Therefore, the relationship mining results may be influenced greatly by some high degree nodes. In this paper, we proposed a new method to solve this problem with the scholar data in DBLP. The credit allocation of each author is calculated, and the co-author network of DBLP is cut into smaller networks based on the characteristic. Then, the advisor-advisee relationship among researchers is mined based on these smaller co-author network. The results show that, the accuracy of this model is about 62.5%, however, this is an unsupervised method, which could save the time of training model and will not be influenced by the uncompleted training data set.

[1]  N. Assimakis,et al.  A new author’s productivity index: p-index , 2010, Scientometrics.

[2]  Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras,et al.  Proposal of a stochastic model to determine the bibliometric variables influencing the quality of a journal: application to the field of Dentistry , 2018, Scientometrics.

[3]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Feng Xia,et al.  Who are the rising stars in academia? , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL).

[5]  Idrissa Sarr,et al.  Survey on Social Ego-Community Detection , 2018, COMPLEX NETWORKS.

[6]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Citation success index - An intuitive pair-wise journal comparison metric , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[7]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Mining advisor-advisee relationships from research publication networks , 2010, KDD.

[8]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Measuring academic influence using heterogeneous author-citation networks , 2019, Scientometrics.

[9]  Chao Huang,et al.  Toward local family relationship discovery in location-based social network , 2017, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[10]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Collective credit allocation in science , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Wenyu Zhang,et al.  A multiple-link, mutually reinforced journal-ranking model to measure the prestige of journals , 2017, Scientometrics.

[12]  Nicolas Dugué,et al.  Is Community Detection Fully Unsupervised? The Case of Weighted Graphs , 2018, COMPLEX NETWORKS.

[13]  Jiebo Luo,et al.  Mining the Relationship between Emoji Usage Patterns and Personality , 2018, ICWSM.

[14]  Hai Zhuge,et al.  Exploiting heterogeneous scientific literature networks to combat ranking bias: Evidence from the computational linguistics area , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Xuhong Zhang,et al.  Activity correlation spectroscopy: a novel method for inferring social relationships from activity data , 2017, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[16]  Chuang Liu,et al.  Identifying the Academic Rising Stars via Pairwise Citation Increment Ranking , 2017, APWeb/WAIM.

[17]  Fang Xu,et al.  Introducing sub-impact factor (SIF-) sequences and an aggregated SIF-indicator for journal ranking , 2014, Scientometrics.

[18]  Paul Donner Effect of publication month on citation impact , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[19]  Feng Xia,et al.  CocaRank: A Collaboration Caliber-based Method for Finding Academic Rising Stars , 2016, WWW.

[20]  Feng Xia,et al.  Big Scholarly Data: A Survey , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Big Data.

[21]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[22]  P. Vinod Babu,et al.  Finding rising stars in co-author networks , 2019 .

[23]  Heyan Huang,et al.  Tri-Rank: An Authority Ranking Framework in Heterogeneous Academic Networks by Mutual Reinforce , 2014, 2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.