Intrinsic Fluorescence Studies of the Chaperonin GroEL Containing Single Tyr → Trp Replacements Reveal Ligand-induced Conformational Changes*

Two mutants of GroEL containing the single tyrosine to tryptophan replacement of either residue 203 or 360 in the apical domain have been purified, characterized, and used for fluorescence studies. Both mutants can facilitate the in vitro refolding of rhodanese in an ATP- and GroES-dependent manner, producing yields of recoverable activity comparable to the wild-type chaperonin. Y203W shows some increased hydrophobic exposure and easier urea-induced disassembly compared with wild-type or Y360W, although the unfolding of all the species was similar at high concentrations of urea. Intrinsic fluorescence studies of the two mutants reveal that nucleotide binding (ADP or AMP-PNP (adenosine 5′-(β,γ-imino)triphosphate)) induces conformational changes in the tetradecamer that are independent of the presence of the co-chaperonin, GroES. The K1/2 for this transition is approximately 5 μM for both mutants. Energy transfer experiments show that the tryptophan fluorescence of the Y360W mutant is partially quenched (∼50%) upon binding of the fluorescent, hydrophobic probe 4,4′-bis(1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonic acid), while the fluorescence of the Y203W mutant is significantly quenched (∼75%). These results are discussed in relation to the molecular mechanism for GroEL function.

[1]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Allosteric control by ATP of non-folded protein binding to GroEL. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  D. Gibbons,et al.  Ligand-induced Conformational Changes in the Apical Domain of the Chaperonin GroEL (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPγS , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[4]  P. Horowitz,et al.  The Chaperonin GroEL Is Destabilized by Binding of ADP (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  P. Horowitz,et al.  Inactive GroEL Monomers Can Be Isolated and Reassembled to Functional Tetradecamers That Contain Few Bound Peptides (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  P. Horowitz,et al.  Refolding and Reassembly of Active Chaperonin GroEL After Denaturation (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  P. Horowitz,et al.  Photoincorporation of 4,4'-bis(1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonic acid) into the apical domain of GroEL: specific information from a nonspecific probe. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[8]  A. Clarke,et al.  The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  D. Gibbons,et al.  Hydrophobic Surfaces That Are Hidden in Chaperonin Cpn60 Can Be Exposed by Formation of Assembly-Competent Monomers or by Ionic Perturbation of the Oligomer (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  E. Eisenstein,et al.  The Hydrophobic Nature of GroEL-Substrate Binding (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Y. Kawata,et al.  The guanidine-induced conformational changes of the chaperonin GroEL from Escherichia coli. Evidence for the existence of an unfolding intermediate state. , 1994, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[12]  P. Horowitz,et al.  Bound substrate polypeptides can generally stabilize the tetradecameric structure of Cpn60 and induce its reassembly from monomers. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[13]  Y. Kashi,et al.  Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release , 1994, Nature.

[14]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8 Å , 1994, Nature.

[15]  E. Bochkareva,et al.  ATP induces non-identity of two rings in chaperonin GroEL. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  Neil A. Ranson,et al.  Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL–GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy , 1994, Nature.

[17]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. , 1994, Science.

[18]  T. Atkinson,et al.  Affinity of chaperonin-60 for a protein substrate and its modulation by nucleotides and chaperonin-10. , 1994, The Biochemical journal.

[19]  A. Azem,et al.  Effect of divalent cations on the molecular structure of the GroEL oligomer. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[20]  T. Atkinson,et al.  The stability and hydrophobicity of cytosolic and mitochondrial malate dehydrogenases and their relation to chaperonin‐assisted folding , 1994, FEBS letters.

[21]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Hydrolysis of adenosine 5'-triphosphate by Escherichia coli GroEL: effects of GroES and potassium ion. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[22]  A. Fersht,et al.  Refolding of barnase in the presence of GroE. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  J. Kaplan,et al.  Great minds think alike , 1993, Current Biology.

[24]  T. Atkinson,et al.  Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonin catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[25]  P. Horowitz,et al.  Characterization of a stable, reactivatable complex between chaperonin 60 and mitochondrial rhodanese. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  M. Fisher Promotion of the in vitro renaturation of dodecameric glutamine synthetase from Escherichia coli in the presence of GroEL (chaperonin-60) and ATP. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[27]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Protein folding in the cell , 1992, Nature.

[28]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Complex interactions between the chaperonin 60 molecular chaperone and dihydrofolate reductase. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[29]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Chaperonins facilitate the in vitro folding of monomeric mitochondrial rhodanese. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[30]  F. Hartl,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of groEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate , 1991, Nature.

[31]  P. Horowitz,et al.  A physical characterization of sulfane sulfurtransferase. , 1990, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[32]  Ellis Rj The molecular chaperone concept. , 1990 .

[33]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Reconstitution of active dimeric ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase from an unfolded state depends on two chaperonin proteins and Mg-ATP , 1989, Nature.

[34]  H. Fritz,et al.  Efficient oligonucleotide-directed construction of mutations in expression vectors by the gapped duplex DNA method using alternating selectable markers. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[36]  G. Lorimer,et al.  GroE heat-shock proteins promote assembly of foreign prokaryotic ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase oligomers in Escherichia coli , 1989, Nature.

[37]  Roger W. Hendrix,et al.  Homologous plant and bacterial proteins chaperone oligomeric protein assembly , 1988, Nature.

[38]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Purification and properties of the groES morphogenetic protein of Escherichia coli. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[39]  J. Lakowicz Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy , 1983 .

[40]  D. Dearborn,et al.  Labeling of proteins by reductive methylation using sodium cyanoborohydride. , 1979, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[41]  R. Hendrix Purification and properties of groE, a host protein involved in bacteriophage assembly. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.