Referendum Models and Negative Willingness to Pay: Alternative Solutions

Traditional referendum models of contingent valuation with linear utility functions and additive errors have troubled researchers because they routinely predict negative willingness to pay. We explore solutions to this problem, including parametric models and the Turnbull empirical distribution estimator of willingness to pay exploited by Carsonet al.We show that there are closed form solutions for estimates of the empirical distribution function from the Turnbull likelihood maximization problem which correspond to the self-consistency algorithm proposed by Turnbull and the pooled adjacent violators algorithm (PAVA) described by Robertson, Wright, and Dykstra and implemented by21. Further, a lower bound estimate of willingness to pay and the associated variance can be calculated by hand. The Turnbull estimator solves the problem of estimating negative willingness to pay without resorting to ad hoc distribution assumptions. It is shown that central tendency measures of willingness to pay from parametric models are sensitive to the assumed distribution, while the lower bound Turnbull estimate is robust across distributions.

[1]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Social Choice , 1994 .

[2]  A Mixture Model of Willingness to Pay Distributions , 1996 .

[3]  S. Cosslett DISTRIBUTION-FREE MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATOR OF THE BINARY CHOICE MODEL1 , 1983 .

[4]  Per-Olov Johansson,et al.  Current Issues in Environmental Economics , 1995 .

[5]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[6]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[7]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[8]  R. Carson,et al.  Valuing the Preservation of Australia's Kakadu Conservation Zone , 1994 .

[9]  David A. Patterson,et al.  Inference and Optimal Design for a Welfare Measure in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1991 .

[10]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? , 1995 .

[11]  B. Turnbull The Empirical Distribution Function with Arbitrarily Grouped, Censored, and Truncated Data , 1976 .

[12]  P. Zarembka Frontiers in econometrics , 1973 .

[13]  F. T. Wright,et al.  Order restricted statistical inference , 1988 .

[14]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  Referendum Contingent Valuation Estimates: Sensitivity to the Assignment of Offered Values , 1991 .

[15]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good , 1996 .

[16]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression' , 1988 .

[17]  Bengt Kriström,et al.  A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. , 1990 .

[18]  Per-Olov Johansson,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data: Comment , 1989 .