BELIEFS ABOUT THE CUES TO DECEPTION IN HIGH- AND LOW-STAKE SITUATIONS

Prison officers and students completed a questionnaire concerning beliefs about 34 verbal and non-verbal behaviours in high- and low-stake situations. They were asked to consider behaviour in four different situations (two high-stake and two low-stake) and were asked to rate each scenario in terms of both the behaviour that they believed that they would show and the behaviour that they believed someone else would show. For each behaviour they were asked to rate on a seven-point scale how frequently they believed it occurred during deception (when compared to truth-telling). While there were no differences within high- and low-stake conditions (i.e. between scenarios of similar stakes), certain behaviours were believed to increase more in high-stake situations compared to low-stake ones. People rated their own behaviour differently to other people's, suggesting that they believed they would appear more credible in deception situations than other people would. Prison officers and students did not differ in their overall beliefs about the cues to deception in line with previous research. Results are discussed in terms of the roles that high-stake, infrequent, easily accessible situations and unsuccessful deceptions may play in the development and maintenance of general beliefs about the cues to deception.

[1]  Ray Bull,et al.  Lay Persons' and Police Officers' Beliefs Regarding Deceptive Behaviour , 1996 .

[2]  Michael J. Cody,et al.  Deception: Paralinguistic and Verbal Leakage , 1984 .

[3]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics , 1993 .

[4]  P. Ekman,et al.  Detecting deception from the body or face. , 1974 .

[5]  Luigi Anolli,et al.  The Voice of Deception: Vocal Strategies of Naive and Able Liars , 1997 .

[6]  Günter Köhnken,et al.  Behavioral Correlates of Statement Credibility: Theories, Paradigms, and Results , 1989 .

[7]  P. Ekman Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace , 1985 .

[8]  B. Depaulo,et al.  The Motivational Impairment Effect in the Communication of Deception , 1989 .

[9]  Police Officers' and Students' Beliefs about Telling and Detecting Trivial and Serious Lies , 2003 .

[10]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  Lie experts' beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception , 1996 .

[11]  Stephen Porter,et al.  The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context , 1996 .

[12]  P. Ekman,et al.  The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Beliefs About Cues to Deception: Mindless Stereotypes or Untapped Wisdom? , 1999 .

[14]  Brian R. Lashley,et al.  Fishy-looking liars: deception judgment from expectancy violation. , 1992 .

[15]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar. , 1983 .

[16]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Behavioral Correlates of Deception in a Simulated Police Interview , 1995 .

[17]  Simon Hayes,et al.  Act 4 , 1998, Romeo and Juliet.

[18]  Paul Ekman,et al.  Lying and nonverbal behavior: Theoretical issues and new findings , 1988 .

[19]  S. Christianson,et al.  Hands up! A study of witnesses' emotional reactions and memories associated with bank robberies , 1993 .

[20]  Frieda Goldman Eisler Psycholinguistics : experiments in spontaneous speech , 1968 .

[21]  A. Vrij,et al.  The effects of varying stake and cognitive complexity on beliefs about the cues to deception , 2000 .

[22]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  Insight into behavior displayed during deception , 1996 .

[23]  Expectations of honest, evasive, and deceptive nonverbal behavior , 1987 .

[24]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Fishy-looking liars: deception judgment from expectancy violation. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  R. Koestner,et al.  Beliefs about cues associated with deception , 1981 .

[26]  B. Depaulo,et al.  The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replications and extensions , 1988 .

[27]  W. Brewer,et al.  Role of schemata in memory for places , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  B. Depaulo,et al.  On-the-Job Experience and Skill at Detecting Deception1 , 1986 .