Simplified soft-output demapper for binary interleaved COFDM with application to HIPERLAN/2

A comparison in the performance between hard- and soft-decision Viterbi decoding, with application to the HIPERLAN/2 standard, is presented. The results show that when channel state information (CSI) is included in the generation of the soft-decision information, the soft-decision method greatly outperforms the hard method. Moreover, a simplified algorithm for the soft-output demapper for the 16-QAM and 64-QAM constellations is developed, which allows the complexity of the demapper to be maintained at almost the same level for all the possible modes of HIPERLAN/2.

[1]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  Bit-interleaved coded modulation with iterative decoding , 1997, IEEE Communications Letters.

[2]  David Bull,et al.  A comparison of HIPERLAN/2 and IEEE 802.11a physical and MAC layers , 2000, IEEE Benelux Chapter on Vehicular Technology and Communications. Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology. SCVT-2000. Proceedings (Cat. No.00EX465).

[3]  J H Stott Explaining some of the magic of COFDM , 2000 .

[4]  Ramesh Pyndiah,et al.  Performance of block turbo coded 16-QAM and 64-QAM modulations , 1995, Proceedings of GLOBECOM '95.

[5]  Ephraim Zehavi,et al.  8-PSK trellis codes for a Rayleigh channel , 1992, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[6]  Heinrich Meyr,et al.  Low complexity space-frequency MLSE for multi-user COFDM , 1999, Seamless Interconnection for Universal Services. Global Telecommunications Conference. GLOBECOM'99. (Cat. No.99CH37042).

[7]  Giuseppe Caire,et al.  Bit-Interleaved Coded Modulation , 2008, Found. Trends Commun. Inf. Theory.