Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies

[1]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[2]  Mark Yates,et al.  Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: evidence from multiple tasks. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Greg B. Simpson,et al.  The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  S. Lupker,et al.  Strategic effects in word naming: examining the route-emphasis versus time-criterion accounts. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Derek Besner,et al.  Neighbourhood density effects in reading aloud: new insights from simulations with the DRC model. , 2002, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[7]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Identical Words are Read Differently in Different Languages , 2001, Psychological science.

[8]  S. Mathey.  L'influence du voisinage orthographique lors de la reconnaissance des mots écrits. , 2001 .

[9]  D J Mewhort,et al.  Modeling lexical decision and word naming as a retrieval process. , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[10]  S. Lupker,et al.  Orthographic neighborhood effects in perceptual identification and semantic categorization tasks: A test of the multiple read-out model , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Orthographic neighbourhood effects in parallel distributed processing models. , 1999 .

[12]  David A. Balota,et al.  The Utility of Item-Level Analyses in Model Evaluation: A Reply to Seidenberg and Plaut , 1998 .

[13]  S. Andrews.  The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .

[14]  David A. Balota,et al.  Bringing Computational Models of Word Naming Down to the Item Level , 1997 .

[15]  Ronald Peereman,et al.  Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences? , 1995 .

[16]  L. Katz,et al.  Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: effects of letter delay and nonword context difficulty. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .

[19]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  S. Andrews.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[21]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[22]  Gordon D. A. Brown.  Resclving inconsistency: A computational model of word naming , 1987 .

[23]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[25]  A. Cutler.  Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? , 1981, Cognition.

[26]  G. M. Reicher.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[28]  M. Zorzi,et al.  Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. , 1998 .

[29]  R. Peereman.  Orthographic and phonological neighborhoods in naming French words and pseudowords , 1996 .

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[31]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[32]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[33]  D. D. Wheeler.  Processes in word recognition , 1970 .