Fine-tuning the degree of stem cell polarization and alignment on ordered arrays of high-aspect-ratio nanopillars.

Nanobiomaterials are introducing new capabilities to coordinate cell selection, growth, morphology, and differentiation. Herein, we report that tuning the geometry of ordered arrays of nanopillars (NP) elicits specialized morphologies in adherent cells. Systematic analysis of the effects of the NP radius, height, and spacing reveals that stem cells assume either flattened, polarized, or stellate morphologies in direct response to interpillar spacing. Notably, on NPs of pitch near a critical spacing (d(crit) ≈ 2 μm for C3H10T1/2 cells), cells exhibit rounding of the cell body, pronounced polarization, and extension of narrow axon-like cell projections aligned with the square lattice of the NP array and extending hundreds of micrometers. Furthermore, increasing the NPs' aspect ratio from 12:1 to 50:1 to produce NPs with a corresponding reduction in the NP bending stiffness of 2 orders of magnitude amplified the cellular response and resulted in a previously unseen degree of cell polarization and alignment. The rapid morphological transformation is reproducible on surfaces that maintain key parameters of the NP geometry and spacing, is influenced by the cell seeding density, and persists for different stem cell lines and primary mesenchymal stem cells. The demonstrated ability to support various morphogenetic trends in stem cells by simply tuning the geometry of the NP substrates provides a stepping-stone for the future design of scaffolds where cellular morphology and alignment are crucial.

[1]  Erwin Schwab,et al.  State of the art and future trends , 2003 .

[2]  J. Spatz,et al.  Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[3]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  TRANSMEMBRANE EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX – CYTOSKELETON CROSSTALK , 2001 .

[4]  Christine E Schmidt,et al.  Nanostructured scaffolds for neural applications. , 2008, Nanomedicine.

[5]  Lars Montelius,et al.  Axonal outgrowth on nano-imprinted patterns. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[6]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[7]  S. Wind,et al.  Fabrication and surface chemistry of nanoscale bioarrays designed for the study of cytoskeletal protein binding interactions and their effect on cell motility , 2005 .

[8]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[9]  J. Aizenberg,et al.  Reversible Switching of Hydrogel-Actuated Nanostructures into Complex Micropatterns , 2007, Science.

[10]  Nathan J. Sniadecki,et al.  Geometric Considerations of Micro‐ to Nanoscale Elastomeric Post Arrays to Study Cellular Traction Forces , 2007 .

[11]  Xuanhe Zhao,et al.  Microbristle in gels: Toward all-polymer reconfigurable hybrid surfaces , 2010 .

[12]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates , 2010, Nature Methods.

[13]  F. M. Sasoglu,et al.  Design and microfabrication of a high-aspect-ratio PDMS microbeam array for parallel nanonewton force measurement and protein printing , 2007 .

[14]  Larry L Hench,et al.  Third-Generation Biomedical Materials , 2002, Science.

[15]  Jay X. Tang,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity of stiff filament networks: strain stiffening, negative normal stress, and filament alignment in fibrin gels. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[16]  Benjamin M. Wu,et al.  Cell interaction with three-dimensional sharp-tip nanotopography. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[17]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Micromechanical control of cell and tissue development: implications for tissue engineering. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[18]  C. Heidelberger,et al.  Establishment and characterization of a cloned line of C3H mouse embryo cells sensitive to postconfluence inhibition of division. , 1973, Cancer research.

[19]  Lei Yang,et al.  Nanobiomaterials: State of the Art and Future Trends , 2011 .

[20]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[22]  A S Rudolph,et al.  Spatially controlled adhesion, spreading, and differentiation of endothelial cells on self-assembled molecular monolayers. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Growth Factors, Matrices, and Forces Combine and Control Stem Cells , 2009, Science.

[24]  Molly M Stevens,et al.  Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. , 2011, Science.

[25]  Sami Alom Ruiz,et al.  Nanotechnology for Cell–Substrate Interactions , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Kshitiz Gupta,et al.  Mechanosensitivity of fibroblast cell shape and movement to anisotropic substratum topography gradients. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[27]  Sungho Jin,et al.  Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Cell signaling arising from nanotopography: implications for nanomedical devices. , 2006, Nanomedicine.

[29]  A Curtis,et al.  Topographical control of cells. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[30]  Lauren D. Zarzar,et al.  Structural transformation by electrodeposition on patterned substrates (STEPS): a new versatile nanofabrication method. , 2012, Nano letters.

[31]  Ann-Sofie Andersson,et al.  The effects of continuous and discontinuous groove edges on cell shape and alignment. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[32]  J. Aizenberg,et al.  Growth of polygonal rings and wires of CuS on structured surfaces , 2011 .

[33]  Joanna Aizenberg,et al.  Enriching libraries of high-aspect-ratio micro- or nanostructures by rapid, low-cost, benchtop nanofabrication , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[34]  Xin Zhang,et al.  Cellular mechanics study in cardiac myocytes using PDMS pillars array , 2006 .

[35]  Geneca Joo Yi. Tan,et al.  Nanofibrous scaffold with incorporated protein gradient for directing neurite outgrowth , 2011, Drug Delivery and Translational Research.

[36]  Shamik Sen,et al.  Matrix Strains Induced by Cells: Computing How Far Cells Can Feel , 2009, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[37]  R. Langer,et al.  Designing materials for biology and medicine , 2004, Nature.

[38]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Cooperative modulation of neuritogenesis by PC12 cells by topography and nerve growth factor. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[39]  O. MacDougald,et al.  The influence of Leucine-rich amelogenin peptide on MSC fate by inducing Wnt10b expression. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[40]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[41]  Lisa A Flanagan,et al.  Neurite branching on deformable substrates , 2002, Neuroreport.

[42]  M. Isaacson,et al.  Attachment of astroglial cells to microfabricated pillar arrays of different geometries. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[43]  Georg J. Schmitz,et al.  Manufacture of high-aspect-ratio micro-hair sensor arrays , 2005 .

[44]  K. Leong,et al.  Multifunctional nanorods for gene delivery , 2003, Nature materials.

[45]  L. Greene,et al.  Establishment of a noradrenergic clonal line of rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cells which respond to nerve growth factor. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Alexander K. Epstein,et al.  Fabrication of Bioinspired Actuated Nanostructures with Arbitrary Geometry and Stiffness , 2009 .

[47]  K. Nguyen,et al.  Nanotopography: cellular responses to nanostructured materials. , 2006, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[48]  Jochen Guck,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cell mechanics from the attached to the suspended state. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Joanna Aizenberg,et al.  Bacteria pattern spontaneously on periodic nanostructure arrays. , 2010, Nano letters.

[50]  B. Geiger,et al.  Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal contacts. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[51]  Peidong Yang,et al.  Interfacing silicon nanowires with mammalian cells. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[52]  Krista L. Niece,et al.  Selective Differentiation of Neural Progenitor Cells by High-Epitope Density Nanofibers , 2004, Science.

[53]  L. Mahadevan,et al.  Self-Organization of a Mesoscale Bristle into Ordered, Hierarchical Helical Assemblies , 2009, Science.

[54]  M. Bissell,et al.  The Influence of Extracellular Matrix on Gene Expression: Is Structure the Message? , 1987, Journal of Cell Science.

[55]  D. Brunette,et al.  Substratum surface topography alters cell shape and regulates fibronectin mRNA level, mRNA stability, secretion and assembly in human fibroblasts. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[56]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Mechanical control of tissue growth: function follows form. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  J. Jansen,et al.  Modulation of epithelial tissue and cell migration by microgrooves. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[58]  C. Murphy,et al.  Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[59]  Janos Vörös,et al.  Systematic study of osteoblast response to nanotopography by means of nanoparticle-density gradients. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[60]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[61]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Effects of substratum morphology on cell physiology , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[62]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.