How Causal Probabilities Might Fit into Our Objectively Indeterministic World

We suggest a rigorous theory of how objective single-case transition probabilities fit into our world. The theory combines indeterminism and relativity in the “branching space–times” pattern, and relies on the existing theory of causae causantes (originating causes). Its fundamental suggestion is that (at least in simple cases) the probabilities of all transitions can be computed from the basic probabilities attributed individually to their originating causes. The theory explains when and how one can reasonably infer from the probabilities of one “chance set-up” to the probabilities of another such set-up that is located far away.

[1]  A. Eagle.  21 Arguments Against Propensity Analyses of Probability , 2003 .

[2]  George Henry Radcliffe Parkinson,et al.  Philosophy and logic , 1994 .

[3]  J. Woodward,et al.  Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World , 1988 .

[4]  Tomasz Placek.  On Belnap’s Branching Space-Times , 2003 .

[5]  Thomas Müller,et al.  Probability Theory and Causation: A Branching Space-Times Analysis , 2005, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[6]  Nuel Belnap,et al.  No-common-cause EPR-like Funny Business in Branching Space-times , 2002 .

[7]  A. Eagle.  Twenty-One Arguments against Propensity Analyses of Probability , 2004 .

[8]  Ming Xu,et al.  Causation in Branching Time (I): Transitions, Events and Causes , 1997, Synthese.

[9]  Nuel D. Belnap,et al.  EPR-Like “Funny Business” in the Theory of Branching Space-Times , 2002 .

[10]  N. Belnap,et al.  Branching space-time, postprint January, 2003 , 2003 .

[11]  Tomasz Placek,et al.  Non-locality and Modality , 2002 .

[12]  D. Lewis.  A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance , 1980 .

[13]  J. Bell.  On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1964 .

[14]  N. Belnap,et al.  Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World , 2001 .

[15]  Nuel Belnap,et al.  Branching space-time , 1992, Synthese.

[16]  Nuel Belnap,et al.  Double Time References: Speech-act Reports as Modalities in an Indeterminist Setting , 2000, Advances in Modal Logic.

[17]  Thomas Müller,et al.  Branching space-time, modal logic, and the counterfactual conditional , 2002 .

[18]  Richard C. Jeffrey,et al.  Studies in inductive logic and probability , 1971 .

[19]  Nuel D. Belnap,et al.  A Theory of Causation: Causae Causantes (Originating Causes) as Inus Conditions in Branching Space-Times , 2005, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[20]  Tobias J. Hagge,et al.  Physics , 1929, Nature.

[21]  Tomasz Placek,et al.  Partial Indeterminism is Enough: A Branching Analysis of Bell-Type Inequalities , 2002 .

[22]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Scientific Image , 1980 .

[23]  M. Sharlow.  A New Non-Hausdorff Spacetime Model for Resolution of the Time Travel Paradoxes☆ , 1998 .

[24]  G. N. Fleming.  Covariant Position Operators, Spin, and Locality , 1965 .