Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) can be typically used to achieve Continuous Monitoring (CM) or Event-Detection Driven (EDD) inside the supervised area. For both applications, sensors consume energy for three main reasons: sensing, processing and wireless communicating. The wireless communication refers to data transmission and reception. Among these three operations, it is known that the most power consuming task is data transmission. Approximatively 80% of power consumed in each sensor node is used for data transmission. Hence, unnecessary transmissions and/or unnecessary large data packets reduce the system’s lifetime. In this work, we are interested in studying different data transmission schemes that reduce the energy consumption by means of compression, in order to reduce the data packet’s length, or by means of avoiding transmission of redundant information. Continuous-monitoring applications require periodic refreshed data information at the sink nodes. To date, this entails the need of the sensor nodes to transmit continuously in a periodic fashion to the sink nodes, which may lead to excessive energy consumption. In this work, we show that continuous-monitoring does not imply necessarily continuous reporting. Instead, we demonstrate that we can achieve continuous-monitoring using an event-driven reporting approach. For example, consider a continuous-monitoring temperature application, where each sensor node transmits periodically the sensed temperature to the sink node. In such application, it may happen that sensors have very similar reading during long periods of time and it would not be energy-efficient for sensors to continuously send the same value to the sink node. The network lifetime would be greatly increased by programming the sensors to transmit only when they have sensed a change in the temperature compared to the last transmitted information. In doing so, the end user would have a refreshed value of the temperature in the supervised area even if the sensors are not transmitting continuously in a periodic fashion. The final user would have exactly the same information gathered by the WSN as with the classical continuous-monitoring applications, but while the sensors only transmit when there is relevant data. 5
[1]
Anantha P. Chandrakasan,et al.
An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks
,
2002,
IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..
[2]
Bruno Sericola,et al.
Continuous Monitoring Using Event-Driven Reporting for Cluster-Based Wireless Sensor Networks
,
2009,
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.
[3]
B. Sericola.
Closed form solution for the distribution of the total time spent in a subset of states of a homogeneous Markov process during a finite observation period
,
1990
.
[4]
David E. Culler,et al.
TOSSIM: accurate and scalable simulation of entire TinyOS applications
,
2003,
SenSys '03.
[5]
J.J. Astrain,et al.
Hierarchical and fault-tolerant data aggregation in wireless sensor networks
,
2007,
2007 2nd International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing.
[6]
Mohammad Abdul Azim,et al.
SAG: Smart Aggregation Technique for Continuous-Monitoring in Wireless Sensor Networks
,
2010,
2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.
[7]
Prasant Mohapatra,et al.
Medium access control in wireless sensor networks
,
2007,
Comput. Networks.
[8]
David E. Culler,et al.
A transmission control scheme for media access in sensor networks
,
2001,
MobiCom '01.
[9]
I.F. Akyildiz,et al.
Spatial correlation-based collaborative medium access control in wireless sensor networks
,
2006,
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.