Binaural Hearing after Cochlear Implantation in Subjects with Unilateral Sensorineural Deafness and Tinnitus

The aim of this clinical study was to assess speech recognition in noise after cochlear implantation in subjects with single-sided deafness and incapacitating tinnitus. 20 subjects complaining of severe intractable tinnitus unresponsive to treatment received a MED-EL cochlear implant (CI). 11 subjects had normal hearing (NH group) on the contralateral side, while 9 used a hearing aid (HA group). The subjects were tested in noise in two listening conditions, i.e. with their acoustic hearing only and with adding the CI to the acoustic hearing (binaural). Subjective improvement in daily life was evaluated using the Speech Spatial and Qualities Hearing Scale (SSQ). The summation effect (3.3 dB for the HA group and 0.6 dB for the NH group) is not significant in both groups. A significant squelch effect of adding the CI was seen for the HA users (3.8 dB), but not for the NH group (1.2 dB). Additionally, a significant effect of adding the CI was found for the spatial configuration where noise is presented in front and speech on the CI side for both the HA group (6.5 dB) and the NH group (1.7 dB). Results of the SSQ show a significant overall benefit of wearing the CI for both groups. The preliminary results of these 20 subjects suggest that cochlear implantation can improve hearing in people suffering from single-sided deafness combined with tinnitus.

[1]  D. M. Green,et al.  Sound localization by human listeners. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  Richard S. Tyler,et al.  Patients Utilizing a Hearing Aid and a Cochlear Implant: Speech Perception and Localization , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[3]  P. Nopp,et al.  Head Shadow, Squelch, and Summation Effects in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[4]  Richard S Tyler,et al.  Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  D D Dirks,et al.  The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  E. Shaw Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Teresa Y. C. Ching,et al.  Binaural Benefits for Adults Who Use Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants in Opposite Ears , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[8]  A. M. Tharpe Unilateral and Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss in Children: Past and Current Perspectives , 2008, Trends in amplification.

[9]  J. Müller,et al.  Speech Understanding in Quiet and Noise in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant System , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[11]  R. Tyler,et al.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Ilona Anderson,et al.  Incapacitating Unilateral Tinnitus in Single-Sided Deafness Treated by Cochlear Implantation , 2008, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[13]  W. Noble,et al.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[14]  Robert F Labadie,et al.  Localization by Postlingually Deafened Adults Fitted With a Single Cochlear Implant , 2008, The Laryngoscope.

[15]  R Plomp,et al.  The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R Plomp,et al.  A clinical test for the assessment of binaural speech perception in noise. , 1990, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[17]  T. Ching,et al.  Binaural redundancy and inter-aural time difference cues for patients wearing a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears , 2005, International journal of audiology.

[18]  Mandy Hill,et al.  An Overview of Binaural Advantages for Children and Adults Who Use Binaural/Bimodal Hearing Devices , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[19]  R. Plomp,et al.  Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[21]  R. Carhart,et al.  Monaural and Binaural Discrimination against Competing Sentences , 1965 .

[22]  R. V. van Hoesel Exploring the Benefits of Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[23]  R R Coles,et al.  Binaural advantages in hearing of speech , 1971, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[24]  J L Punch,et al.  Nonsense-syllable recognition in noise using monaural and binaural listening strategies. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  J. Tyberghein,et al.  Hearing in children. , 1984, Acta oto-rhino-laryngologica Belgica.