NASA GRC Compass Team Conceptual Point Design and Trades of a Hybrid Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP)/Chemical Propulsion Human Mars Deep Space Transport (DST) Vehicle

NASA has long been conducting studies which apply different in-space propulsion technology assumptions to the mission of sending humans to Mars. Two of the technologies under study that are considered to be the most near-term with respect to technology readiness level (TRL) are traditional chemical propulsion systems and high-power Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) systems. The benefit of relatively low trip times inherent in using impulsive chemical propulsion systems to perform the full round-trip DV for human Mars missions is hampered by the large propellant mass required to perform these burns. SEP systems offer the benefit of much lower propellant requirements to perform the same round-trip missions, at the cost of longer trip times. Traditionally, impulsive chemical systems are better suited than SEP when used in a gravity well, and SEP systems are more efficient than traditional impulsive systems when used in interplanetary space. A typical mission to Mars includes both of these scenarios, and thus several NASA architecture studies, performed over the last few years, have looked to combine the use of both SEP and chemical propulsion systems where they are the most beneficial to human Mars missions. This combined propulsion system concept has been referred to as a SEP/Chem hybrid Mars Transfer Vehicle and is currently shown as the concept Deep Space Transport (DST) in the March 2017 NASA presentation to the National Aerospace Council (NAC).

[1]  Steven R. Oleson,et al.  A Combined Solar Electric and Storable Chemical Propulsion Vehicle for Piloted Mars Missions , 2014 .

[2]  Ryan Rapetti,et al.  Development of a 13 kW Hall Thruster Propulsion System Performance Model for AEPS , 2017 .

[3]  S. Hoffman,et al.  Human exploration of Mars, Design Reference Architecture 5.0 , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[4]  Kathryn Hambleton,et al.  Deep Space Gateway to Open Opportunities for Distant Destinations , 2017 .

[5]  James H. Gilland,et al.  Plasma Plume Characterization of the HERMeS During a 1722-hr Wear Test Campaign , 2017 .

[6]  David Alan Smith,et al.  Space Launch System (SLS) Mission Planner's Guide , 2017 .

[7]  Leon P. Gefert,et al.  Options for the human exploration of Mars using Solar Electric propulsion , 2008 .

[8]  Jacob Williams,et al.  Copernicus Trajectory Design and Optimization System , 2016 .

[9]  Steven R. Oleson,et al.  A High Power Solar Electric Propulsion - Chemical Mission for Human Exploration of Mars , 2014 .

[10]  Bret G. Drake NASA's Decadal Planning Team Mars Mission Analysis Summary , 2007 .

[11]  Melissa L. McGuire,et al.  In-Space Transportation for NASA's Evolvable Mars Campaign , 2015 .

[12]  Diane C. Davis,et al.  Targeting Cislunar Near Rectilinear Halo Orbits for Human Space Exploration , 2017 .

[13]  Stanley K. Borowski,et al.  Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP): A Proven, Growth Technology for Fast Transit Human Missions to Mars , 2013 .

[14]  Melissa L. McGuire,et al.  Comparison of Solar Electric and Chemical Propulsion Missions , 2015 .