Resource Usage Analysis from a Different Perspective on MOOC Dropout

We present a novel learning analytics approach, for analyzing the usage of resources in MOOCs. Our target stakeholders are the course designers who aim to evaluate their learning materials. In order to gain insight into the way educational resources are used, we view dropout behaviour in an atypical manner: Instead of using it as an indicator of failure, we use it as a mean to compute other features. For this purpose, we developed a prototype, called RUAF, that can be applied to the data format provided by FutureLearn. As a proof of concept, we perform a study by applying this tool to the interaction data of learners from four MOOCs. We also study the quality of our computations, by comparing them to existing process mining approaches. We present results that highlight patterns showing how learners use resources. We also show examples of practical conclusions a course designer may benefit from.

[1]  Anastasios A. Economides,et al.  Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining in Practice: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Evidence , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[2]  Ryan S. Baker,et al.  The State of Educational Data Mining in 2009: A Review and Future Visions. , 2009, EDM 2009.

[3]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  MOOCs: What the research of FutureLearn’s UK partners tells us , 2017 .

[4]  David E. Pritchard,et al.  Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom Research into edX's First MOOC. , 2013 .

[5]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Process Mining , 2016, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[6]  Qing Chen,et al.  VisMOOC: Visualizing video clickstream data from massive open online courses , 2015, 2014 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[7]  Austin Gibbons,et al.  Learning Analytics , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[8]  Davide Anguita,et al.  Advances in learning analytics and educational data mining , 2015, ESANN.

[9]  Mina Shirvani Boroujeni,et al.  How to Quantify Student's Regularity? , 2016, EC-TEL.

[10]  Mykola Pechenizkiy,et al.  From Local Patterns to Global Models: Towards Domain Driven Educational Process Mining , 2009, 2009 Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications.

[11]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  MOOC Video Interaction Patterns: What Do They Tell Us? , 2015, EC-TEL.

[12]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Learning Analytics on Coursera Event Data: A Process Mining Approach , 2015, SIMPDA.

[13]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  A reference model for learning analytics , 2012 .

[14]  Lorenzo Vigentini,et al.  Toward the development of a dynamic dashboard for FutureLearn MOOCs , 2016, ASCILITE Publications.

[15]  Li Yuan,et al.  MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education , 2013 .

[16]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Understanding in-video dropouts and interaction peaks in online lecture videos Citation , 2014 .

[17]  Jane Sinclair,et al.  Dropout rates of massive open online courses : behavioural patterns , 2014 .