Limits of multifunctionality in tunable networks

Significance Functionally optimized networks are ubiquitous in nature, e.g., in allosteric proteins that change conformation upon binding to a ligand or vascular networks that distribute oxygen and nutrients in animals or plants. Many of these networks are multifunctional, with proteins that can catalyze more than one substrate or vascular networks that can deliver enhanced flow to more than one localized region of the network. This work investigates the question of how many simultaneous functions a given network can be designed to fulfill, uncovering a phase transition that is related to other constraint–satisfaction transitions such as the jamming transition. Nature is rife with networks that are functionally optimized to propagate inputs to perform specific tasks. Whether via genetic evolution or dynamic adaptation, many networks create functionality by locally tuning interactions between nodes. Here we explore this behavior in two contexts: strain propagation in mechanical networks and pressure redistribution in flow networks. By adding and removing links, we are able to optimize both types of networks to perform specific functions. We define a single function as a tuned response of a single “target” link when another, predetermined part of the network is activated. Using network structures generated via such optimization, we investigate how many simultaneous functions such networks can be programed to fulfill. We find that both flow and mechanical networks display qualitatively similar phase transitions in the number of targets that can be tuned, along with the same robust finite-size scaling behavior. We discuss how these properties can be understood in the context of constraint–satisfaction problems.

[1]  Xi Fang,et al.  3. Full Four-channel 6.3-gb/s 60-ghz Cmos Transceiver with Low-power Analog and Digital Baseband Circuitry 7. Smart Grid — the New and Improved Power Grid: a Survey , 2022 .

[2]  Toshiyuki Nakagaki,et al.  Flow-network adaptation in Physarum amoebae , 2008, Theory in Biosciences.

[3]  Dan Hu,et al.  Adaptation and optimization of biological transport networks. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[4]  M. Labarbera Principles of design of fluid transport systems in zoology. , 1990, Science.

[5]  Giorgio Parisi,et al.  Universality of the SAT-UNSAT (jamming) threshold in non-convex continuous constraint satisfaction problems , 2017, 1702.06919.

[6]  Andrea J. Liu,et al.  The Jamming Transition and the Marginally Jammed Solid , 2010 .

[7]  Klaus Ley,et al.  Handbook of physiology : microcirculation , 2008 .

[8]  Andrea J Liu,et al.  Spatial structure of states of self stress in jammed systems. , 2016, Soft matter.

[9]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  J. Pittermann The evolution of water transport in plants: an integrated approach , 2010, Geobiology.

[11]  S. Light,et al.  The diversity of allosteric controls at the gateway to aromatic amino acid biosynthesis , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[12]  C. Calladine Buckminster Fuller's “Tensegrity” structures and Clerk Maxwell's rules for the construction of stiff frames , 1978 .

[13]  Andrea J Liu,et al.  The Principle of Independent Bond-Level Response: Tuning by Pruning to Exploit Disorder for Global Behavior. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[14]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  The cortical angiome: an interconnected vascular network with noncolumnar patterns of blood flow , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  S. Pellegrino Structural computations with the singular value decomposition of the equilibrium matrix , 1993 .

[16]  Yu-Rong Gao,et al.  Mechanical restriction of intracortical vessel dilation by brain tissue sculpts the hemodynamic response , 2015, NeuroImage.

[17]  Federico Bussolino,et al.  Biological Aspects of Tumour Angiogenesis , 2003 .

[18]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  The multilayer temporal network of public transport in Great Britain , 2015, Scientific Data.

[19]  E. B. Wilson Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference , 1927 .

[20]  Le Yan,et al.  Architecture and coevolution of allosteric materials , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Marco Aiello,et al.  The Power Grid as a Complex Network: a Survey , 2011, ArXiv.

[22]  Anders Krogh,et al.  Introduction to the theory of neural computation , 1994, The advanced book program.

[23]  Henrik Ronellenfitsch,et al.  Global Optimization, Local Adaptation, and the Role of Growth in Distribution Networks. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[24]  I. Bahar,et al.  Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function. , 2010, Annual review of biophysics.

[25]  Holger Flechsig,et al.  Design of Elastic Networks with Evolutionary Optimized Long-Range Communication as Mechanical Models of Allosteric Proteins , 2017, Biophysical journal.

[26]  W S McCulloch,et al.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity , 1990, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[27]  Sidney Redner,et al.  Fractal and Multifractal Scaling of Electrical Conduction in Random Resistor Networks , 2008 .

[28]  M. Mézard,et al.  Analytic and Algorithmic Solution of Random Satisfiability Problems , 2002, Science.

[29]  Nidhi Pashine,et al.  Designing allostery-inspired response in mechanical networks , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Nidhi Pashine,et al.  Auxetic metamaterials from disordered networks , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  J. Sherman,et al.  Adjustment of an Inverse Matrix Corresponding to a Change in One Element of a Given Matrix , 1950 .

[32]  André A. S. T. Ribeiro,et al.  A Chemical Perspective on Allostery. , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[33]  Daniel Hexner,et al.  Role of local response in manipulating the elastic properties of disordered solids by bond removal. , 2017, Soft matter.

[34]  A. Tero,et al.  Rules for Biologically Inspired Adaptive Network Design , 2010, Science.

[35]  M. Mintun,et al.  Brain work and brain imaging. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[36]  G. Biroli,et al.  Theoretical perspective on the glass transition and amorphous materials , 2010, 1011.2578.

[37]  Giancarlo Ruocco,et al.  On the Maximum Storage Capacity of the Hopfield Model , 2017, Frontiers Comput. Neurosci..

[38]  Andrea J. Liu,et al.  Jamming at zero temperature and zero applied stress: the epitome of disorder. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[39]  A. J. Liu,et al.  The onset of jamming as the sudden emergence of an infinite k-core cluster , 2004 .

[40]  M. Brenner,et al.  Random network peristalsis in Physarum polycephalum organizes fluid flows across an individual , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Tang,et al.  Mapping between random central-force networks and random resistor networks. , 1987, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[42]  J. Schlessinger,et al.  Allosteric regulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor kinase , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  V. Hilser,et al.  The ensemble nature of allostery , 2014, Nature.

[44]  M. Fricker,et al.  Analysis of fungal networks , 2012 .

[45]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[46]  Martin van Hecke,et al.  Non-affine response: Jammed packings vs. spring networks , 2009, 0907.0012.

[47]  Eleni Katifori,et al.  Damage and fluctuations induce loops in optimal transport networks. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[48]  L. Sack,et al.  Leaf venation: structure, function, development, evolution, ecology and applications in the past, present and future. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[49]  Luigi Preziosi,et al.  Cancer Modelling and Simulation , 2003 .

[50]  Le Yan,et al.  Architecture and Co-Evolution of Allosteric Materials , 2016, bioRxiv.