A critical synopsis of the diagnostic and screening radiology outcomes literature.

[1]  C. Blackmore,et al.  Economic analyses of radiological procedures: a methodological evaluation of the medical literature. , 1998, European journal of radiology.

[2]  S. Siegelman,et al.  Improving radiology research methods: what is being asked and who is being studied? , 1997, Radiology.

[3]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Extending Screening Mammography Guidelines To Include Women 40 to 49 Years of Age , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  B. Hillman,et al.  Acutely injured knee: effect of MR imaging on diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. , 1997, Radiology.

[5]  R. Deyo,et al.  Rapid MR imaging versus plain radiography in patients with low back pain: initial results of a randomized study. , 1997, Radiology.

[6]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Assessment of the efficacy of noninvasive screening for patients with asymptomatic neck bruits. , 1997, Stroke.

[7]  T Heeren,et al.  Adverse events with radiographic contrast agents: results of the SCVIR Contrast Agent Registry. , 1997, Radiology.

[8]  C C Blackmore,et al.  Methodologic evaluation of the radiology cost-effectiveness literature. , 1997, Radiology.

[9]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. , 1997, JAMA.

[10]  H. Welch,et al.  Screening for disease. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Milton C. Weinstein,et al.  Recommendations for Reporting Cost-effectiveness Analyses , 1996 .

[12]  M C Weinstein,et al.  Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1996, JAMA.

[13]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1996, JAMA.

[14]  M. Weinstein,et al.  The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1996, JAMA.

[15]  R. Prati,et al.  A prospective, parallel, double-blind comparison of iodixanol and iohexol in extremity phlebography. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[16]  T. Koepsell,et al.  Screening magnetic resonance images versus plain films for low back pain: a randomized trial of effects on patient outcomes. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[17]  A. Sapega,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Knee Disorders , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[18]  C P Langlotz,et al.  Evaluating health services: the importance of patients' preferences and quality of life. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  S. Feig.  Mammographic screening of women aged 40–49 years. Benefit, risk, and cost considerations , 1995, Cancer.

[20]  C. J. Rosenquist,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies. , 1995, JAMA.

[21]  László Tabár,et al.  Quantitative Interpretation of Age-Specific Mortality Reductions From the Swedish Breast Cancer-Screening Trials , 1995 .

[22]  M. Hunink,et al.  Triage of patients to angiography for detection of aortic rupture after blunt chest trauma: cost-effectiveness analysis of using CT. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  H. Forman,et al.  Health care cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis: an overview. , 1995, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[24]  Joni K. Evans,et al.  A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetuses. The RADIUS Study Group. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  N. Powe.  Economic and cost-effectiveness investigations of radiologic practices. , 1994, Radiology.

[26]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Intensive Diagnostic Follow-up After Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial , 1994 .

[27]  M. Indelli,et al.  Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. The GIVIO Investigators. , 1994, JAMA.

[28]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-up. , 1994, JAMA.

[29]  R. Higashida,et al.  Double-Blind Study of a New Nonionic Contrast Agent for Digital Subtraction Arteriography , 1994, Investigative Radiology.

[30]  J R Thornbury,et al.  Eugene W. Caldwell Lecture. Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: love it or leave it. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  J. Meléndez,et al.  Anxiety-related reactions associated with magnetic resonance imaging examinations. , 1993, JAMA.

[32]  S. Wall,et al.  Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials , 1993, The Lancet.

[33]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[34]  J. J. Caro,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  S. Moss,et al.  A case-control evaluation of the effect of breast cancer screening in the United Kingdom trial of early detection of breast cancer. , 1992, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[36]  J. Richardson,et al.  A cost utility analysis of mammography screening in Australia. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[37]  N. Powe,et al.  Nephrotoxicity of high-osmolality versus low-osmolality contrast media: randomized clinical trial. , 1992, Radiology.

[38]  N. Powe,et al.  Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  L. Tabár,et al.  Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[40]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Breast cancer screening and cost‐effectiveness; Policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors , 1991, International journal of cancer.

[41]  Dennis G. Fryback,et al.  The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[42]  B. Trock,et al.  Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[43]  E. Bergstralh,et al.  Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the mayo lung project , 1991, Cancer.

[44]  T. Kozuka,et al.  Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. , 1990, Radiology.

[45]  A. Huggins,et al.  Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years , 1990, The Lancet.

[46]  D. Hammond,et al.  1989 ARRS President's Award. The validity and utility of sonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis in the community setting. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[47]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Time interval since last test in a breast cancer screening programme: a case-control study in Italy. , 1989, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[48]  L. Tabár,et al.  The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit. , 1989, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[49]  N. Powe,et al.  Results of randomized controlled trials of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media. , 1989, Radiology.

[50]  T. Landberg,et al.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. , 1988, BMJ.

[51]  W F Taylor,et al.  Lung cancer screening: the Mayo program. , 1986, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[52]  Anthony B. Miller,et al.  Lung Cancer Screening , 1986 .

[53]  Melvyn S. Tockman,et al.  Survival and Mortality from Lung Cancer in a Screened Population: The Johns Hopkins Study , 1986 .

[54]  G. Guyatt,et al.  The role of before-after studies of therapeutic impact in the evaluation of diagnostic technologies. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.

[55]  H. Sox,et al.  Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[56]  E. Potchen,et al.  Application of an information-theoretic method for efficacy assessment. , 1985, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[57]  J. Hendriks,et al.  MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING AND BREAST CANCER MORTALITY: AGE-SPECIFIC EFFECTS IN NIJMEGEN PROJECT, 1975-82 , 1985, The Lancet.

[58]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. , 1982, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[59]  E. Mason,et al.  Five‐year‐plus survival of breast screenees , 1981, Cancer.

[60]  A L Evans,et al.  The use of information theory in evaluating the contribution of radiological and laboratory investigations to diagnosis and management. , 1979, Clinical radiology.

[61]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial , 1977, Cancer.