Compressive Strength and Workability Characteristics of Low-Calcium Fly ash-based Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete

Due to growing environmental concerns of the cement industry, alternative cement technologies have become an area of increasing interest. It is now believed that new binders are indispensable for enhanced environmental and durability performance. Self-compacting Geopolymer concrete is an innovative method and improved way of concreting operation that does not require vibration for placing it and is produced by complete elimination of ordinary Portland cement. This paper documents the assessment of the compressive strength and workability characteristics of low-calcium fly ash based selfcompacting geopolymer concrete. The essential workability properties of the freshly prepared Self-compacting Geopolymer concrete such as filling ability, passing ability and segregation resistance were evaluated by using Slump flow, V-funnel, L-box and J-ring test methods. The fundamental requirements of high flowability and segregation resistance as specified by guidelines on Self Compacting Concrete by EFNARC were satisfied. In addition, compressive strength was determined and the test results are included here. This paper also reports the effect of extra water, curing time and curing temperature on the compressive strength of self-compacting geopolymer concrete. The test results show that extra water in the concrete mix plays a significant role. Also, longer curing time and curing the concrete specimens at higher temperatures will result in higher compressive strength. Keywords—Fly ash, Geopolymer Concrete, Self-compacting concrete, Self-compacting Geopolymer concrete

[1]  D Hardjito,et al.  Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2005 .

[2]  Ángel Palomo,et al.  Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future , 1999 .

[3]  G. Escadeillas,et al.  Metakaolin, a solution for the precast industry to limit the clinker content in concrete: Mechanical aspects , 2010 .

[4]  J. Davidovits,et al.  Geopolymeric concretes For Environmental Protection , 1990 .

[5]  C. Druta.  Tensile strength and bonding characteristics of self-compacting concrete , 2003 .

[6]  J. Davidovits.  Geopolymers : inorganic polymeric new materials , 1991 .

[7]  B. Rangan,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF FLY ASH-BASED GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE , 2004 .

[8]  V. M. Malhotra,et al.  Introduction: Sustainable Development and Concrete Technology , 2002 .

[9]  J.S.J. van Deventer,et al.  THE EFFECT OF COMPOSITION AND TEMPERATURE ON THE PROPERTIES OF FLY ASH- AND KAOLINITE -BASED GEOPOLYMERS , 2002 .

[10]  Jadambaa Temuujin,et al.  Preparation and characterisation of fly ash based geopolymer mortars , 2010 .

[11]  Paulo J.M. Monteiro,et al.  The evolution of strength and crystalline phases for alkali-activated ground blast furnace slag and fly ash-based geopolymers , 2010 .

[12]  T. Salloum.  Effect of fly ash replacement on alkali and sulphate resistance of mortars , 2007 .

[13]  H. Okamura,et al.  Self‐compacting high performance concrete , 1997 .

[14]  B. Rangan,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND PROPERTIES OF LOW-CALCIUM FLY ASH-BASED GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE , 2005 .

[15]  K. MacKenzie,et al.  Synthesis and characterisation of materials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: sodium polysialate polymers , 2000 .

[16]  Hemant Sood,et al.  Incorporating European Standards for Testing Self Compacting Concrete in Indian Conditions , 2009 .

[17]  S. Dröge.  Climate Change and the Cement Industry , 2009 .

[18]  Pavel Rovnaník,et al.  Effect of curing temperature on the development of hard structure of metakaolin-based geopolymer , 2010 .

[19]  Tarun R. Naik.  SUSTAINABILITY OF CEMENT AND CONCRETE INDUSTRIES , 2009 .