Pathways to Participation

The premise of this article is that adult participation in politics is affected by strong preadult forces in addition to the contemporaneous factors emphasized by recent studies. To test this premise, data are drawn from the 1965–1973 national socialization panel study of young Americans and their parents. Four causal models depicting pathways to participation among young adults are evaluated; each includes civic orientations as intervening variables. Three of the models assess the direct and indirect effects of parental characteristics—socioeconomic status, political activity, and civic orientations. The fourth model assesses the impact of adolescent involvement in high school activities. Taken individually, each pathway is shown to have an effect on adult participation, with parent socioeconomic status and high school activism having the most impact. When the four pathways are combined in a single model to reflect the connections among them, all remain important. The combined model illustrates the importance of a variety of methods of political learning. The combined model also demonstrates the crucial role of civic orientations in converting preadult experiences into later participation. Civic orientations are the primary carriers of preadult political learning. Overall, the results rebut the critics of socialization research who have questioned the existence of a linkage between early learning and adult political behavior.

[1]  Peter M. Blau,et al.  The American Occupational Structure , 1967 .

[2]  Richard G. Niemi,et al.  The Division of Political Labor Between Mothers and Fathers , 1971, American Political Science Review.

[3]  M. Jennings.  Comment on Richard Merelman's “Democratic Politics and the Culture of American Education” , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[4]  Gary D. Sandefur,et al.  Opportunity and Change. , 1978 .

[5]  Richard M. Merelman.  Democratic Politics and the Culture of American Education , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Ronald B. Rapoport.  The Sex Gap in Political Persuading: Where the "Structuring Principle" Works* , 1981 .

[7]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture , 1963 .

[8]  D. Easton,et al.  The Child'S Acquisition of Regime Norms: Political Efficacy , 1967, American Political Science Review.

[9]  G. Rabinowitz,et al.  The Primacy Principle: Attitude Change and Political Socialization , 1976, British Journal of Political Science.

[10]  R. Niemi,et al.  Political Periods and Political Participation , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[11]  Donald D. Searing,et al.  The Structuring Principle: Political Socialization and Belief Systems , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[12]  T. Cook.  The Political Involvement of Adolescents , 1981, American Political Science Review.

[13]  Lee H. Ehman,et al.  An Analysis of the Relationships of Selected Educational Variables with the Political Socialization of High School Students , 1969 .

[14]  Robert D. Hess,et al.  The Development of Political Attitudes in Children. , 1968 .

[15]  R. Connell.  POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION IN THE AMERICAN FAMILY: THE EVIDENCE RE-EXAMINED , 1972 .

[16]  David Ziblatt.  High School Extracurricular Activities and Political Socialization , 1965 .

[17]  Social Structure and Political Participation: Developmental Relationships, Part I , 1969 .

[18]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  The American Occupational Structure , 1967 .

[19]  D. Marsh.  Political Socialization: the Implicit Assumptions Questioned , 1971, British Journal of Political Science.