Evaluation of inter-individual pelvic CT-scans registration

Abstract Image registration appears to be an essential tool in a wide range of biomedical applications. We are interested in performing voxel-wise population analysis aimed at explaining sideways effects of dose irradiation across a population treated for prostate cancer. To this end, a perfect registration of pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans is required allowing a reliable mapping of dose distributions in a single coordinate system. In this paper, we compared the performances of four different inter-individual intensity-based registration strategies: two affine (block matching and mask-restricted block matching) and two non-rigid (diffeomorphic demons and free-form deformation). Pelvic CT-scans were registered towards a single template in a leave-one-out cross validation scheme. The ability of the methods to align inter-individual images was assessed in terms of overlap measures between the manually segmented organs after the registration. Results show that the free-form deformation registration strategy outperformed the other methods and provided more accurate registrations. We showed that precision can be improved by restricting the algorithm calculations to the main regions of interest.

[1]  Marnix G Witte,et al.  Relating dose outside the prostate with freedom from failure in the Dutch trial 68 Gy vs. 78 Gy. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Chao Lu,et al.  Integrated Segmentation and Nonrigid Registration for Application in Prostate Image-Guided Radiotherapy , 2010, MICCAI.

[3]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[4]  Olivier Salvado,et al.  Atlas Based Segmentation and Mapping of Organs at Risk from Planning CT for the Development of Voxel-Wise Predictive Models of Toxicity in Prostate Radiotherapy , 2010, Prostate Cancer Imaging.

[5]  Hualiang Zhong,et al.  FEM-based evaluation of deformable image registration for radiation therapy , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Non-parametric Diffeomorphic Image Registration with the Demons Algorithm , 2007, MICCAI.

[7]  Hyunjin Park,et al.  Validation of automatic target volume definition as demonstrated for 11C-choline PET/CT of human prostate cancer using multi-modality fusion techniques. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[8]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  J M Fitzpatrick,et al.  The role of registration in accurate surgical guidance , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[10]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: Atlas selection and its effect on accuracy , 2009, NeuroImage.

[11]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Subject-Matched Templates for Spatial Normalization , 2009, MICCAI.

[12]  H. Hricak,et al.  Prostate cancer imaging , 2008, Acta radiologica.

[13]  C. Moore,et al.  Deformable Image Registration - A Critical Evaluation: Demons, B-Spline FFD and Spring Mass System , 2008, 2008 Fifth International Conference BioMedical Visualization: Information Visualization in Medical and Biomedical Informatics.

[14]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Reconstructing a 3D structure from serial histological sections , 2001, Image Vis. Comput..

[15]  Benoît Macq,et al.  Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  Arno Klein,et al.  Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  Pascal Haigron,et al.  Evaluation of multi-atlas-based segmentation of CT scans in prostate cancer radiotherapy , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[18]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Urinary obstruction in prostate cancer patients from the Dutch trial (68 Gy vs. 78 Gy): relationships with local dose, acute effects, and baseline characteristics. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  J B Poline,et al.  Direct voxel-based comparison between grey matter hypometabolism and atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Implementation and validation of a three-dimensional deformable registration algorithm for targeted prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[22]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[23]  Vladimir Pekar,et al.  Assessment of a model-based deformable image registration approach for radiation therapy planning. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.