Ancillary Services in the Health Care Industry: Is Six Sigma Reasonable?

Within the naval medical center construct, the disparate disciplines encompassed within ancillary services lend themselves to formal quality analysis and process improvement. This analysis uses the Six Sigma approach. Error rates were investigated and calculated for various processes within ancillary services at Naval Medical Center, San Diego. These were translated into the common metric of defects per million opportunities (DPMO). DPMO rates vary between 21.5 and 420,000. These correspond to Sigma values from 1.7 to approaching 6. Rates vary with biological complexity of the system and the degree of automation available. Some ancillary services translate well into a Six Sigma schema. Systems with high potential patient risk if performed poorly and those amenable to second checking and computer oversight may be candidates for such optimization. This should be undertaken in a local environment conducive to individual error reporting, and in a corporate environment with the will and funding to support the transition.

[1]  J. Reason.  Human error: models and management , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  K. Sazama,et al.  Reports of 355 transfusion‐associated deaths: 1976 through 1985 , 1990, Transfusion.

[3]  The Six Sigma Revolution , 2002 .

[4]  M Galloway,et al.  Benchmarking and the laboratory , 2001, Journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  M. J. Harry,et al.  SIX SIGMA : A BREAKTHROUGH STRATEGY FOR PROFITABILITY , 1998 .

[6]  D Nevalainen,et al.  Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale. , 2000, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[7]  S. Payne,et al.  Variations in pediatric pneumonia and bronchitis/asthma admission rates. Is appropriateness a factor? , 1995, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[8]  Healthy people 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives and healthy schools. , 1991, The Journal of school health.

[9]  A E Voytovich,et al.  Transfusion errors in New York State: an analysis of 10 years' experience , 2000, Transfusion.

[10]  P. Hulick,et al.  Peer review and performance improvement in a radiation oncology clinic. , 1999, Quality management in health care.

[11]  National, state, and urban area vaccination coverage levels among children aged 19-35 months--United States, 1999. , 2000, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[12]  H. Lloyd,et al.  ISO 9000 quality standards: a model for blood banking? , 1995, Transfusion.

[13]  H. Cohen,et al.  Serious hazards of transfusion (SHOT) initiative: analysis of the first two annual reports , 1999, BMJ.

[14]  J. Callum,et al.  Reporting of near‐miss events for transfusion medicine: improving transfusion safety , 2001, Transfusion.

[15]  C. Whitsett,et al.  Assessment of blood administration procedures:problems identified by direct observationand administrative incident reporting , 2001, Transfusion.

[16]  A. D. Bonnell.  Quality Program Implementation , 1994 .

[17]  D. Cousins,et al.  Developing a uniform reporting system for preventable adverse drug events. , 1998, Clinical therapeutics.

[18]  M. Chassin.  Is health care ready for Six Sigma quality? , 1998, The Milbank quarterly.

[19]  P. Johnstone,et al.  Yield of mammography in selected patients age ≤ 30 years , 2001, Cancer.

[20]  J. Eichhorn,et al.  Prevention of intraoperative anesthesia accidents and related severe injury through safety monitoring. , 1989, Anesthesiology.

[21]  S. Crawford,et al.  Survey of hospital systems and common serious medication errors. , 1998, Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management.