Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game

Western research on interpersonal behavior patterns and rules of exchange needs to move beyond the assumption of isolated individuals socialized to make rational decisions on the basis of self-interest. A review of recent research shows that Chinese society and other similar societies follow rules that deviate from those of the West. In such societies, norms of reciprocity (bao) are intense, but these norms are heavily shaped by the hierarchically structured network of social relations (guanxi) in which people are embedded, by the public nature of obligations, and by the long time period over which obligations are incurred through a self-conscious manipulation of face and related symbols. These special cultural symbols, as well as the historical monopoly of valuable resources by powerful leaders, help explain he origin of these patterns. There are several forces leading to change but also some sources of continuity, which help maintain these patterns regardless of political and economic context.

[1]  Andrew G. Walder,et al.  Organized Dependency and Cultures of Authority in Chinese Industry , 1983, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[2]  David M. Messick,et al.  Equity theory: Psychological and sociological perspectives , 1983 .

[3]  M. Bond,et al.  How Chinese and Americans reward task-related contributions: A preliminary study. , 1982 .

[4]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Why Justice? Normative and Instrumental Interpretations , 1982 .

[5]  Fox Butterfield,et al.  China, alive in the bitter sea = 苦海余生 , 1982 .

[6]  J. Tedeschi.  Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research , 1981 .

[7]  Joel Rudd,et al.  5 – Situated Identities and Response Variables , 1981 .

[8]  B. R. Schlenker.  Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1980 .

[9]  Li-min Chu.  The Sensitivity of Chinese and American Children to Social Influences , 1979 .

[10]  D. Baldwin.  Power and Social Exchange , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[11]  K. Cook,et al.  Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks , 1978 .

[12]  R. C. Lao.  Levenson's IPC (Internal-External Control) Scale , 1978 .

[13]  R. Benedict.  The chrysanthemum and the sword : patterns of Japanese culture , 1978 .

[14]  J. Traupmann,et al.  Equity: Theory and Research , 1978 .

[15]  M. Wolf.  Child Training And The Chinese Family , 1978 .

[16]  M. Lerner.  The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms1 , 1977 .

[17]  G. Leventhal.  What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships. , 1976 .

[18]  D. Ho.  On the Concept of Face , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Robert H. Silin.  Leadership and Values: The Organization of Large-Scale Taiwanese Enterprises , 1976 .

[20]  T. Lebra,et al.  Japanese patterns of behavior , 1976 .

[21]  Yang K-s.  Psychological correlates of family size, son preference, and birth control in Taiwan. , 1976, [Yan jiu bao gao] Science reports of the National Taiwan University. Guo li Taiwan da xue. Xin li xue xi.

[22]  E. Sampson.  On Justice as Equality , 1975 .

[23]  M. Deutsch.  Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice? , 1975 .

[24]  E. G. Shapiro,et al.  Effect of expectations of future interaction on reward allocations in dyads: Equity or equality. , 1975 .

[25]  David Podmore,et al.  Educational Experience as an Influence on “Modern” and “Traditional” Attitudes: Some Evidence from Hong Kong , 1974 .

[26]  Lily C. Huang,et al.  Altruism and Imitation in Chinese and Americans: A Cross-Cultural Experiment , 1974 .

[27]  Robert D. Meade,et al.  Conformity and Anticonformity among Americans and Chinese , 1973 .

[28]  Psychological Characteristics of Chinese-American Students. , 1972 .

[29]  J. Dawson,et al.  Effects of Parental Attitudes and Modern Exposure on Chinese Traditional-Modern Attitude Formation , 1972 .

[30]  C. N. Alexander,,et al.  Situated identities and social psychological experimentation. , 1971 .

[31]  Robert D. Meade.  Leadership Studies of Chinese and Chinese-Americans , 1970 .

[32]  D. J. Schneider.  Tactical self-presentation after success and failure. , 1969 .

[33]  P. Hiniker.  Chinese reactions to forced compliance: dissonance reduction or national character. , 1969, The Journal of social psychology.

[34]  J. Mitchell,et al.  The Concept and Use of Social Networks , 1969 .

[35]  J. O. Whittaker,et al.  A cross-cultural study of authoritarianism. , 1967, The Journal of social psychology.

[36]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[37]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[38]  A. Arkoff,et al.  Comparative Need Patterns of Five Ancestry Groups in Hawaii , 1962 .

[39]  G. Thompson,et al.  A Comparative Study of Selected Attitudes, Values, and Personality Characteristics of American, Chinese, and Indian Students , 1962 .

[40]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[41]  Robert W. Scofield,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Differential Effect upon Personality of Chinese and American Child Training Practices , 1960 .

[42]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[43]  中村 元,et al.  The ways of thinking of Eastern peoples , 1960 .

[44]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[45]  Morton Fried,et al.  Fabric of Chinese society : a study of the social life of a Chinese county seat , 1953, The Far Eastern Quarterly.

[46]  M. J. Levy,.  Contrasting Factors in the Modernization of China and Japan , 1954, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[47]  Francis L. K. Hsu,et al.  Americans and Chinese : two ways of life , 1953 .

[48]  Ai-li S. Chin.  Some Problems of Chinese Youth in Transition , 1948, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  M. Opler,et al.  Under the ancestors' shadow , 1948 .

[50]  R. E. Baber,et al.  Chinese Family and Society. , 1947 .

[51]  Zhang Zhiyi,et al.  Peasant Life in China , 1939, Nature.