The Effect of Phase Cancellation on Estimates of Calcaneal Broadband Ultrasound Attenuation in Vivo

Broadband ultrasonic attenuation (BUA) is a clinically-accepted measurement for prediction of osteoporotic fracture risk. Typical clinical BUA measurements are performed with phase-sensitive receivers and, therefore, can be affected by phase cancellation. In order to separate the effects of conventional attenuation (absorption plus scattering) From phase cancellation, BUA was measured on phantoms with acrylic wedge phase aberrators and on 73 women using both phase sensitive (PS) and phase insensitive (PI) reception. A clinical bone sonometer with a two-dimensional (2-D) receiver array was used. PI BUA measurements on phantoms with acrylic wedge phase aberrators were found to be far more resistant to phase cancellation than PS BUA measurements. In data from 73 women, means and standard deviations for BUA measurements were 81.4 plusmn21.4 dB/MHz (PS) and 67.2plusmn 9.7 dB/MHz (PI). The magnitude of the discrepancy between PS BUA and PI BUA tended to increase with bone mineral density (BMD).

[1]  Wei Lin,et al.  The influence of cortical end-plate on broadband ultrasound attenuation measurements at the human calcaneus using scanning confocal ultrasound. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  C. Langton,et al.  The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone. , 1984, Engineering in medicine.

[3]  F. Peyrin,et al.  Frequency dependence of ultrasonic backscattering in cancellous bone: autocorrelation model and experimental results. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W. O’Brien,et al.  Phase insensitive ultrasonic attenuation coefficient determination of fresh bovine liver over an extended frequency range , 1981 .

[5]  P. Miller Controversies in Bone Mineral Density Diagnostic Classifications , 2000, Calcified Tissue International.

[6]  Florian Hartl,et al.  Prediction of Hip Fracture Risk by Quantitative Ultrasound in More Than 7000 Swiss Women ≥70 Years of Age: Comparison of Three Technologically Different Bone Ultrasound Devices in the SEMOF Study , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  G. Breart,et al.  Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study , 1996, The Lancet.

[8]  K. Wear Ultrasonic attenuation in human calcaneus from 0.2 to 1.7 MHz , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  S. Giannini,et al.  Quantitative heel ultrasound in a population-based study in Italy and its relationship with fracture history: the ESOPO study , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[10]  I. Kiviranta,et al.  Prediction of density and mechanical properties of human trabecular bone in vitro by using ultrasound transmission and backscattering measurements at 0.2–6.7 MHz frequency range , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  C C Glüer,et al.  Osteoporosis: association of recent fractures with quantitative US findings. , 1996, Radiology.

[12]  C. Glüer Quantitative Ultrasound--it is time to focus research efforts. , 2007, Bone.

[13]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  An overview of bone sonometry , 2004 .

[14]  G Berger,et al.  In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and quantitative computed tomography. , 1997, Bone.

[15]  J. Cauley,et al.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. , 1997, Archives of Internal Medicine.

[16]  J. Taylor,et al.  Quantitative Heel Ultrasound in 3180 Women Between 45 and 75 Years of Age: Compliance, Normal Ranges and Relationship to Fracture History , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[17]  C M Langton,et al.  Computer and experimental simulation of a cortical end-plate phase cancellation artefact in the measurement of BUA at the calcaneus. , 2001, Physiological measurement.

[18]  P. Laugier,et al.  Assessment of the relationship between broadband ultrasound attenuation and bone mineral density at the calcaneus using BUA imaging and DXA , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[19]  P. Miller,et al.  Discordance in patient classification using T-scores. , 1999, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[20]  G W Petley,et al.  Broadband ultrasonic attenuation: are current measurement techniques inherently inaccurate? , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  James A. Zagzebski,et al.  Ultrasound transmission measurements through the os calcis , 1991, Calcified Tissue International.

[22]  P. Delmas,et al.  Do We Need to Change the WHO Definition of Osteoporosis? , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[23]  C F Njeh,et al.  Orthogonal relationships between ultrasonic velocity and material properties of bovine cancellous bone. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  Reinhard Barkmann,et al.  Association of Five Quantitative Ultrasound Devices and Bone Densitometry With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in a Population‐Based Sample: The OPUS Study , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Comparison of Three Bone Ultrasounds for the Discrimination of Subjects With and Without Osteoporotic Fractures Among 7562 Elderly Women , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[26]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound of the Calcaneus Reflects the Mechanical Properties of Calcaneal Trabecular Bone , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  J. A. Evans,et al.  Dependence of the velocity and attenuation of ultrasound in bone on the mineral content. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  H. Trębacz,et al.  Ultrasound Velocity and Attenuation in Cancellous Bone Samples from Lumbar Vertebra and Calcaneus , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[29]  P. Laugier,et al.  In vitro measurement of the frequency-dependent attenuation in cancellous bone between 0.2 and 2 MHz. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  J. Jurvelin,et al.  Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[31]  C. Langton,et al.  Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[32]  J. Rho,et al.  Low-megahertz ultrasonic properties of bovine cancellous bone. , 2000, Bone.

[33]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  E. Barrett-Connor,et al.  Prediction of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal White Women With Peripheral Bone Densitometry: Evidence From the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[35]  C. Turner,et al.  Calcaneal ultrasonic measurements discriminate hip fracture independently of bone mass , 1995, Osteoporosis International.

[36]  Robert Luben,et al.  Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study , 2004, The Lancet.

[37]  R. Siffert,et al.  Ultrasonic bone assessment: "the time has come". , 2007, Bone.

[38]  K. Wear Frequency dependence of ultrasonic backscatter from human trabecular bone: theory and experiment. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  L. J. Busse,et al.  Detection of spatially nonuniform ultrasonic radiation with phase sensitive (piezoelectric) and phase insensitive (acoustoelectric) receivers , 1981 .

[40]  F Duboeuf,et al.  Ultrasound discriminates patients with hip fracture equally well as dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry and independently of bone mineral density , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[41]  D. Hans,et al.  Does follow-up duration influence the ultrasound and DXA prediction of hip fracture? The EPIDOS prospective study. , 2004, Bone.

[42]  L. J. Busse,et al.  Phase Cancellation, Reflection, and Refraction Effects in Quantitative Ultrasonic Attenuation Tomography , 1977 .

[43]  K. Khaw,et al.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) of the heel bone and its correlates in men and women in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort: a cross-sectional population-based study , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[44]  Tainsong Chen,et al.  The measurements of ultrasound parameters on calcaneus by two-sided interrogation techniques , 2005 .

[45]  Burton E. Sobel,et al.  Application of Phase-insensitive Detection and Frequency-Dependent Measurements to Computed Ultrasonic Attenuation Tomography , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[46]  J. Zagzebski,et al.  Comparison of speed of sound and ultrasound attenuation in the os calcis to bone density of the radius, femur and lumbar spine. , 1989, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[47]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Do quantitative ultrasound measurements reflect structure independently of density in human vertebral cancellous bone? , 1998, Bone.

[48]  D. Hans,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound parameters as well as bone mineral density are better predictors of trochanteric than cervical hip fractures in elderly women. Results from the EPIDOS study. , 2005, Bone.

[49]  J. A. Evans,et al.  On the ultrasonic attenuation and its frequency dependence in the os calcis assessed with a multielement receiver. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[50]  J. Currey,et al.  Prediction of mechanical properties of the human calcaneus by broadband ultrasonic attenuation. , 1996, Bone.

[51]  K. Wear,et al.  Anisotropy of ultrasonic backscatter and attenuation from human calcaneus: implications for relative roles of absorption and scattering in determining attenuation. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[53]  H. K. Genant,et al.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation signals depend on trabecular orientation: An in vitro study , 1993, Osteoporosis International.