The development and evaluation of CADMIUM: a prototype system to assist in the interpretation of mammograms

We have developed CADMIUM, a novel approach for the design of systems to assist in the interpretation of medical images. CADMIUM uses symbolic reasoning to relate information obtained from image processing to the decisions radiologists take. The approach is based on a symbolic decision procedure which has already been used successfully in a variety of nonimaging clinical decision systems. In CADMIUM this decision procedure is extended with models of three generic image interpretation tasks: detection, measurement and classification of image features. The extended procedure is used to construct the lines of reasoning needed in each task and to control the acquisition of information by image processing. CADMIUM has been evaluated as an aid to the differential diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammographic images. Radiographers who had been trained to interpret images performed better when using the advice provided by the system.

[1]  D. Dance,et al.  Classification of ductal carcinoma in situ by image analysis of calcifications from digital mammograms. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  Bassett Lw Mammographic analysis of calcifications. , 1992 .

[3]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Detection of Mammographic Microcalcifications Using a Statistical Model , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[4]  Andrew Todd-Pokropek,et al.  A model for integrating image processing into decision aids for diagnostic radiology , 1997, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[5]  Chien-Shun Lo,et al.  Automatic Detection of Microcalcifications in Digital Mammograms , 1996 .

[6]  M D Fox,et al.  Application of expert systems to mammographic image analysis. , 1989, American journal of physiologic imaging.

[7]  P Taylor Computer Aids for Decision-making in Diagnostic Radiology , 1995 .

[8]  W. Simpson,et al.  Descriptive terms for mammographic abnormalities: observer variation in application. The Northern Region Breast Screening Radiology Audit Group. , 1996, Clinical radiology.

[9]  H. Lemke Computer-assisted radiology. , 1988, Journal of digital imaging.

[10]  K L Lam,et al.  Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network. , 1995, Medical physics.

[11]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC CALCIFICATIONS , 1993 .

[12]  Baoyu Zheng,et al.  Computer assisted diagnosis for digital mammography , 1995 .

[13]  John Fox,et al.  Decision support and disease management: a logic engineering approach , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[14]  C. E. Kahn Decision aids in radiology. , 1996, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[15]  E. Patrick,et al.  Expert learning system network for diagnosis of breast calcifications. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[16]  P. Taylor Invited review: computer aids for decision-making in diagnostic radiology--a literature review. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  C. Floyd,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  K S Heilbrunn The American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: barking up the wrong tree? , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  K. Doi,et al.  Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms. Methodology and preliminary clinical study. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[20]  Dmitry B. Goldgof,et al.  Biomedical Image Processing and Biomedical Visualization , 1993 .

[21]  E. Sickles Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation. , 1986, Radiology.

[22]  Y. Wu,et al.  Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 1993, Radiology.

[23]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[24]  Paul Krause,et al.  Representing Uncertain Knowledge , 1993, Springer Netherlands.

[25]  G. Dunn,et al.  Alignment of fibroblasts on grooved surfaces described by a simple geometric transformation. , 1986, Journal of cell science.

[26]  John Fox,et al.  A Unified Framework for Hypothetical and Practical Reasoning (2): Lessons from Medical Applications , 1996, FAPR.

[27]  J Y Lo,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: artificial neural network approach for optimized merging of mammographic features. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[28]  R. Pauli,et al.  Radiographers as film readers in screening mammography: an assessment of competence under test and screening conditions. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[29]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Automatic detection and classification system for calcifications in mammograms , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[30]  M. Reeder Reeder and Felson’s Gamuts in Radiology , 1993, Springer New York.

[31]  L. Tabár,et al.  Teaching atlas of mammography. , 1983, Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband.

[32]  B. Monsees,et al.  Evaluation of breast microcalcifications. , 1995, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[33]  J. Swets,et al.  Reading and decision aids for improved accuracy and standardization of mammographic diagnosis. , 1992, Radiology.

[34]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Stochastic model for automated detection of calcifications in digital mammograms , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[35]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[36]  I. E. Magnin,et al.  Automatic Microcalcifications Pattern Recognition From X-Ray Mammographies , 1989, Other Conferences.

[37]  N Roberts,et al.  Segmentation and numerical analysis of microcalcifications on mammograms using mathematical morphology. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[38]  Michael Brady,et al.  Integration of Low-Level Processing to Facilitate Microcalcification Detection , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.