Structure–camphor odour relationships using the Generation and Selection of Pertinent Descriptors approach

Abstract Structure–camphor odour relationships were carried out using GSPD (Generation and Selection of Pertinent Descriptors) or GESDEM (Generation et Selection de Descripteurs et Elaboration de Motifs). This methodology consists in constructing descriptors from fragments. Their size (called order) is increased stepwise to obtain an optimum order giving a best classification. The set of studied compounds included 99 aliphatic alcohols, for which olfactory properties have been described by Schnabel et al. [K.O. Schnabel, H.D. Belitz, C.V. Ranson, Untersuchungen zur Struktur–Aktivitats–Beziehung bei Geruchsstoffen, Z. Lebensm.-Unters.-Forsch. 187 (1988) 215–223]. Classification of compounds was tested by means of artificial neural network (NN) with back-propagation algorithm, Kth nearest neighbour (KNN) and discriminant analysis (DA). After GSPD, all compounds were well-classified and 93% of them were well-predicted by means of leave-one-out method using NN. A new test sample composed of 42 alcohols (25 camphor and 17 non-camphor) with structures analogue to these of training set was collected from Belstein and trained on weight matrix of network which served in classification phase. The results of prediction were at 90.5% in agreement with those of literature.

[1]  Maurice Chastrette,et al.  Structure-Odor Relationships: Using Neural Networks in the Estimation of Camphoraceous or Fruity Odors and Olfactory Thresholds of Aliphatic Alcohols , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[2]  S. So,et al.  Application of neural networks: quantitative structure-activity relationships of the derivatives of 2,4-diamino-5-(substituted-benzyl)pyrimidines as DHFR inhibitors. , 1992, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  B. Kowalski,et al.  K-Nearest Neighbor Classification Rule (pattern recognition) applied to nuclear magnetic resonance spectral interpretation , 1972 .

[4]  Karen J. Rossiter,et al.  Structure−Odor Relationships , 1996 .

[5]  J. Timmermans Odour and Chemical Constitution , 1954, Nature.

[6]  M. Chastrette,et al.  On the role of chirality in structure-odor relationships , 1992 .

[7]  M. Chastrette,et al.  Relations structure-odeur dans la famille des muscs benzéniques nitrés , 1986 .

[8]  Dennis H. Smith,et al.  Stereochemical substructure codes for 13C spectral analysis , 1981 .

[9]  C. Ham,et al.  Structure-activity studies of musk odorants using pattern recognition: monocyclic nitrobenzenes , 1985 .

[10]  John E. Amoore,et al.  CORRELATIONS BETWEEN STEREOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENTS AND ORGANOLEPTIC ANALYSIS OF ODOROUS COMPOUNDS , 1967 .

[11]  David Bawden,et al.  Computerized chemical structure-handling techniques in structure-activity studies and molecular property prediction , 1983, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[12]  Karl-Otto Schnabel,et al.  Untersuchungen zur Struktur-Aktivitäts-Beziehung bei Geruchsstoffen 1. Mitteilung: Wahrnehmungsschwellenwerte und Geruchsqualitäten von gesättigten aliphatischen und alicyclischen Verbindungen mit Sauerstoff-Funktion , 1988 .

[13]  G. Klopman Artificial intelligence approach to structure-activity studies. Computer automated structure evaluation of biological activity of organic molecules , 1985 .

[14]  Jacques-Emile Dubois,et al.  DARC system: notions of defined and generic substructures. Filiation and coding of FREL substructure (SS) classes , 1987, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[15]  R. Venkataraghavan,et al.  Atom pairs as molecular features in structure-activity studies: definition and applications , 1985, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[16]  Nick A. Farmer,et al.  The CAS ONLINE search system. 1. General system design and selection, generation, and use of search screens , 1983, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[17]  H. Belitz,et al.  Untersuchungen zur Struktur-Aktivitätsbeziehung bei Geruchsstoffen , 1992 .

[18]  R. Sheridan,et al.  New methods in computer-aided drug design , 1987 .

[19]  S. Free,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL CONTRIBUTION TO STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY STUDIES. , 1964, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[20]  Jürgen W. Einax,et al.  Chemometrics in Environmental Analysis , 1997 .

[21]  M. Chastrette,et al.  Discrimination of camphoraceous substances using physicochemical parameters , 1983 .

[22]  Gilles Klopman,et al.  Application of the computer automated structure evaluation methodology to a QSAR study of chemoreception. Aromatic musky odorants , 1992 .