Towards an Interoperable Digital Scholarly Edition

Recent proposals for creating digital scholarly editions (DSEs) through the crowdsourcing of transcriptions and collaborative scholarship, for the establishment of national repositories of digital humanities data, and for the referencing, sharing, and storage of DSEs, have underlined the need for greater data interoperability. The TEI Guidelines have tried to establish standards for encoding transcriptions since 1988. However, because the choice of tags is guided by human interpretation, TEI-XML encoded files are in general not interoperable. One way to fix this problem may be to break down the current all-in-one approach to encoding so that DSEs can be specified instead by a bundle of separate resources that together offer greater interoperability: plain text versions, markup, annotations, and metadata. This would facilitate not only the development of more general software for handling DSEs, but also enable existing programs that already handle these kinds of data to function more efficiently.

[1]  David G. Durand,et al.  Refining our Notion of What Text Really Is: The Problem of Overlapping Hierarchies , 1993 .

[2]  James Cummings The Text Encoding Initiative and the Study of Literature , 2013 .

[3]  Dominique Estival,et al.  TEI Encoding and Syntactic Tagging of an Old French Text , 1999, Comput. Humanit..

[4]  Jane Hunter,et al.  Towards Annotopia - Enabling the Semantic Interoperability of Web-Based Annotations , 2012, Future Internet.

[5]  Quinn Dombrowski,et al.  TEI and Project Bamboo , 2013 .

[6]  Justin Tonra,et al.  Transcription maximized; expense minimized? Crowdsourcing and editing The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham , 2012, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[7]  Constance Crompton,et al.  The Social Edition: Scholarly Editing Across Communities , 2012, DH.

[8]  B. Tommie Usdin,et al.  When "It Doesn't Matter" means "It Matters" , 2002, Extreme Markup Languages®.

[9]  Hans Walter Gabler,et al.  Theorizing the Digital Scholarly Edition , 2010 .

[10]  P. Robinson 6. Electronic Editions for Everyone , 2010 .

[11]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked data , 2020, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist.

[12]  James Joyce,et al.  Textual Criticism, Literary Theory, and the New "Ulysses"@@@Ulysses: A Critical and Synoptic Edition , 1987 .

[13]  C. M. Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  Text in the Electronic Age: Texual Study and Textual Study and Text Encoding, with Examples from Medieval Texts , 1991 .

[14]  Elena Pierazzo Digital genetic editions: the encoding of time in manuscript transcription , 2009 .

[15]  Theodor Holm Nelson,et al.  Embedded Markup Considered Harmful , 1997, World Wide Web J..

[16]  Michael Day,et al.  Metadata in a nutshell , 2001 .

[17]  John Unsworth Computational Work with Very Large Text Collections. Interoperability, Sustainability, and the TEI , 2011 .

[18]  Donald Moses,et al.  Islandora and TEI: Current and Emerging Applications/Approaches , 2013 .

[19]  Allen H. Renear The descriptive/procedural distinction is flawed , 2000, Markup Lang..

[20]  Bauman Syd Interchange vs. Interoperability , 2011 .

[21]  María Morrás Ruiz-Falcó Informática y crítica textual: realidades y deseos , 1999 .

[22]  Steven E. Jones The Emergence of the Digital Humanities , 2013 .

[23]  Alexander Geyken,et al.  The DTA 'base format': A TEI-subset for the compilation of interoperable corpora , 2012, KONVENS.

[24]  James Joyce,et al.  Ulysses: A Critical and Synoptic Edition , 1922 .

[25]  David Haynes Metadata: For Information Management and Retrieval , 2004 .