Perception of epenthetic stops

In processing connected speech, listeners must parse a highly variable signal. We investigate processing of a particular type of production variability, namely epenthetic stops between nasals and obstruents. Using a phoneme monitoring task and a dictation task, we test listeners’ perception of epenthetic stops (which are not part of the string of segments intended by the speaker). We con"rm that the epenthetic stop perceived is the one predicted by articulatory accounts of how such stops are produced, and that the likelihood of an epenthetic stop being perceived as a real stop is related to the strength of acoustic cues in the signal. We show that the probability of listeners mis-parsing epenthetic stops as real is in#uenced by language-speci"c syllable structure constraints, and depends on processing demands. We further show, through reaction time data, that even when epenthetic stops are perceived, they impose a greater processing load than stops which were intended by the speaker. These results show that processing of phonetic variability is a!ected by several factors, including language-speci"c phonology, even though the mis-timing of articulations that creates epenthetic stops is universally possible. ( 2001 Academic Press

[1]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS professional statistics 6.1 , 1994 .

[2]  J. Mehler,et al.  Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? , 1999, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[3]  John G. Barnitz.  Bloom-p-field, Chom-p-sky, and Phonetic Epen-t-thesis , 1974 .

[4]  U. Frauenfelder,et al.  A guide to spoken word recognition paradigms , 1997 .

[5]  Cecile T. L. Kuijpers,et al.  Facilitatory Effects of Vowel Epenthesis on Word Processing in Dutch , 1999 .

[6]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[7]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing: Evidence for associative context effects , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The recognition of spoken words with variable representation , 1998 .

[9]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonological Variation in Lexical Access: Abstractness, Inference, and English Place Assimilation. , 1995 .

[10]  On the General Properties of Consonant Epenthesis , 1987, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[11]  Inger M. Mees,et al.  The Sounds of English and Dutch , 1981 .

[12]  S. Anderson.  Nasal Consonants and the Internal Structure of Segments , 1976 .

[13]  Takashi Otake,et al.  Assimilation of place in Japanese and dutch , 1998, ICSLP.

[14]  W. Leo Wetzels.  The Historical Phonology of Intrusive Stops: A Non-Linear Description , 1985 .

[15]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The comparative perspective on spoken-language processing , 1997, Speech Commun..

[17]  R Daniloff,et al.  Intrusive Stops in Nasal-Fricative Clusters: An Aerodynamic and Acoustic Investigation , 1979, Phonetica.

[18]  Makio Kashino,et al.  Phoneme/syllable perception and the temporal structure of speech , 1996 .

[19]  Ann Cutler,et al.  Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review , 1997, Language and speech.

[20]  A Cutler,et al.  The representation of Japanese moraic nasals. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  G. Booij.  The Phonology of Dutch , 1995 .

[22]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. , 1996 .

[23]  Michael T. Wescoat,et al.  Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 1983 .

[24]  Keith Johnson,et al.  A CROSS-LINGUISTIC STUDY OF STOP PLACE PERCEPTION , 1999 .

[25]  R. Port,et al.  Stop Epenthesis in English , 1986 .

[26]  J. Ohala.  A Probable Case of Clicks Influencing the Sound Patterns of Some European Languages , 1995, Phonetica.

[27]  L. Lisker.  Perceiving Final Voiceless Stops without Release: Effects of Preceding Monophthongs versus Nonmonophthongs , 1999, Phonetica.

[28]  Glyne L. Piggott,et al.  The Phonology of Epenthetic Segments , 1985, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[29]  L. Streeter,et al.  Perception of Stop Consonants with Conflicting Transitional Cues: A Cross-Linguistic Study , 1978, Language and speech.

[30]  K. Stevens,et al.  Feature geometry and the vocal tract , 1994, Phonology.

[31]  A. Weber,et al.  Help or Hindrance: How Violation of Different Assimilation Rules Affects Spoken-Language Processing , 1999, Language and speech.